Smt. Vanita Vijay Birmal Thro. Poa Holder and Anr. vs Shri. Sawalaram Ananda Kamble (Mahar) and Ors.

copy of the interim application which is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as informed by respondent no. 3 the heirs and legal representatives of deceased respondent no. 4 are already on record in a different capacity as respondent nos. 6, 8 and 9. He further submits that respondent no. 10 has expired without leaving any heirs. He therefore seeks leave to delete the names of respondent nos. 4 and 10.

¶32

For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed in

¶33

terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within two weeks.

¶34

Ad-interim relief already granted to continue till the next

¶35

date.

¶36

Interim Application No. 1754 of 2026

¶37

5. This application is for bringing on record names of heirs

¶38

and legal representatives of respondent no. 11. There is a delay in filing the application.

¶39

2/4

¶40

31-WP-12363-2017.docx

¶41

By order dated 22^nd August 2025 notice for final disposal of the petition is already issued. Office is therefore directed to issue notice of the interim application as well as the writ petition to the proposed respondent nos. 11(a) to 11(d). Notice shall indicate that the separate notice of the writ petition shall not be issued and the notice issued as per this order shall also be treated as notice in the writ petition. Notice is made returnable on 8^th April 2026.

¶42

In addition to the court notice, learned advocate for the petitioners to serve the proposed respondent nos. 11(a) to 11(d) along with copy of this order and order dated 22^nd

¶43

August 2025 by private service and file service affidavit before the next date.

¶44

Learned advocate for the petitioner shall ensure that copies are supplied and court notice is issued by taking hamdast.

¶45

Writ Petition No. 12363 of 2017

¶46

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent no. 9 is served as per the bailiff report. He therefore submits that order dated 18^th February 2026 be

¶47

3/4

¶48

31-WP-12363-2017.docx

¶49

clarified that as per the bailiff report only respondent nos. 3, 4, 5, 7, 10 and 11 are reported to be dead.

¶50

Office remark shows that notice to respondent no. 9 is awaited. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has annexed copy of the bailiff report to Interim Application (St) No. 6154 of 2026. The said report states that respondent no. 9 is served.

¶51

Learned counsel for respondent no. 2 submits that he

¶52

shall take instructions about the heirs and legal representatives of deceased respondent nos. 3, 5 and 7 and if he receives any instructions he shall intimate the same to the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶53

Ad-interim relief already granted to continue till the next

¶54

date.

¶55

[GAURI GODSE, J.]

¶56

4/4

Smt. Vanita Vijay Birmal Thro. Poa Holder and Anr. v. Shri. Sawalaram Ananda Kamble (Mahar) and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Vanita Vijay Birmal Thro. Poa Holder and Anr. v. Shri. Sawalaram Ananda Kamble (Mahar) and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Laxmichand Bheda vs Ketan Vallabhji Veera

Shri Deoram Kondaji Boraste vs Shri Damodar Mogal Jadhav Deceased

Rajeev Girdharilal Pittie vs Sky Lounge Estates Private Limited

Takshashila Hotels Pvt. Ltd. Thr Its Director vs the Municipal Corporation of the City of Pune

Harendrasinh P. Solanki Since Decd. vs the Honble Administrator, Silvassa , Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Ors.

Harnarayan Ramchandra Sharma Since Decd Thorugh Lrs. vs Sharda Devi Since Dec Thr Lrs