Appeal under the Stamp Act jurisdiction dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant did not appear when called out for hearing. The connected interim application was disposed of as not surviving after the appeal's dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pmk 11-APEAL(ST)-10335-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL(ST) NO.10335 OF 2026
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1678 OF 2026
IN
APPEAL(ST) NO.10335 OF 2026
M/s. D.B. Jajodia(HUF) … Appellant
V/s.
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement & Anr. … Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr Vinod Chate, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 12th June, 2026
P.C.:-
2026, does not survive and is accordingly disposed off.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
M/s. D.B. Jajodia(HUF)
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement
Anr.
A. S. Gadkari
Kamal Khata
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
