Allowed

Vaishali Dattatray Jagtap and Ors. v. Rajabai Suresh Patil and Ors.

Bombay HC17 Feb 2026IA/156/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a thin order granting a stay on proceedings of the trial court suit during the pendency of an appeal from an order remanding the suit. The court relied on a previous interim order already staying the proceedings. No substantive legal proposition is established.

What did the court decide?

Stay granted on proceedings in Regular Civil Suit No. 227 of 1999 during pendency of the appeal.

Vaishali Dattatray Jagtap and Ors. vs Rajabai Suresh Patil and Ors. — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

5-IA-156-2026.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

¶3

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 156 OF 2026

¶5

¶6

APPEAL FROM ORDER ST. NO. 34461 OF 2018

¶7

Vaishali Dattatray Jagtap And Ors. … Applicants/Appellants (Org Plaintiff Nos. 1 to 4) Versus Rajabai Suresh Patil And Ors. … Respondents

¶8

¶9

Mr. Dhananjay Krihsnaji Chavan for the Applicants Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. Balaji Shinde i/by Ashok B. Tajane for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶10

¶11

CORAM : M. M. SATHAYE, J. DATE : 17^th February 2026.

¶12

P. C. :

¶13

Heard learned advocates for the parties.

¶14

This Interim Application is moved urgently by the Appellants seeking stay to the proceedings in Regular Civil Suit No. 227 of 1999.

¶15

Learned advocate for the Appellants invited the attention of the Court to the order dated 05.02.2020 passed by this Court, whereby, prayer clause (c) in CAST/34465/2018 was granted and the impugned order of remand was stayed. It is submitted that despite the said order being brought to the notice of the learned Trial Judge, the suit is being proceeded.

¶16

Learned Counsel for the Respondent seeks time, on the ground that he is not in contact with the concerned clients.

Shubham

5-IA-156-2026.doc

Upon perusal of the record, it appears that the Appeal has already been admitted and interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c) was granted while disposing of the Civil Application. It is thus clear that the Appeal is pending and the impugned order of remand is stayed.

¶21

In that view of the matter, this Interim Application is allowed directing that further proceedings in Regular Civil Suit No. 227 of 1999 pending before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Mohol, District Solapur, shall remain stayed during the pendency of above Appeal From Order.

¶22

[ M. M. SATHAYE, J. ]

¶23

TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO

¶24

Digitally signed by TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Date: 2026.02.17 17:29:35 +0530

¶25

¶26

Shubham

Vaishali Dattatray Jagtap and Ors. v. Rajabai Suresh Patil and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vaishali Dattatray Jagtap and Ors. v. Rajabai Suresh Patil and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Namdev Shivppa Kamble(Deceased) Thr Lrs Nagnath Namdev Kamble Thr. Lrs Chhaya Nagnath Kamble vs Chandrakant Bhagwan Wagmode

Sanjay Kerba Durge and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Nikhil Machindra Ghatge and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Sanjay Machindranath Balkawade Deceased Thro. Legal Heirs vs Shri Kisan Shankar Shelke and Ors.

Thakur Electrical and Engineering Pvt. Ltd.,and Anr. vs Shantabai Ankush Pawar and Ors.

Sukhdeo Tukaram Papare vs Sahebrao Appa Papare