Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution after the appellant twice failed to appear, showing no interest in pursuing the case; pending applications, if any, were also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8-FA-1824-2024.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1824 OF 2024
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation …Appellant through Divisional Controller Versus
Rajendra Rajaram Shewale & Ors …Respondents
None for the Appellant.
SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE
Digitally signed by SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2026.01.09 14:53:41 +0530
Mr Gaurav Ugale , i/b Ankita Pawar, for Respondents Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM: R. M. JOSHI, J. DATED: 9TH JANUARY 2026
PC:-
for the Appellant. This shows that the Appellant is not interested in pursuing the Appeal. Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Page 1 of 1 9th January 2026
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution given the appellant's absence on successive hearing dates.
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation through Divisional Controller
Rajendra Rajaram Shewale
R. M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
