Indusind Bank Limited vs Mohammad Shahid Sayyed — Arbitration | Bombay HC (2026)

Indusind Bank Limited vs Mohammad Shahid Sayyed — Arbitration | Bombay HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Arbitral awards in all listed matters set aside on account of unilateral appointment of the sole arbitrator; Commercial Execution Applications / Execution Applications, connected Interim Applications and Chamber Summons dismissed / disposed; parties permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings in accordance with law, with the period from invocation of arbitration till the date of this order excluded for limitation; liberty to apply where an express agreement in writing under the proviso to Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 waives the sole arbitrator's ineligibility or the right to object under Section 12(5).

Issue for consideration

Whether, in view of the Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision that unilateral appointment of an arbitrator is void ab initio, the arbitral awards in these matters — founded on a unilateral appointment of the sole arbitrator — should be set aside. +2 more

Court's answer

In view of the Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others vs. Airports Authority of India, and since the appointment of the sole arbitrator in all these matters was found by the office of the Prothonotary & Senior Master to have been unilateral, the respective arbitral awards stand set aside.

Ratio / Principle

With the awards set aside, the Commercial Execution Applications / Execution Applications, the connected Interim Applications and the Chamber Summons, if any, stand dismissed / disposed.

Key takeaways

It is open to the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings in accordance with law.ratio¶18
As far as limitation is concerned, in initiating fresh arbitration proceedings the period from the invocation of the arbitration till the date of this order is to be excluded.ratio¶19
Liberty to apply is reserved for the event that there exists an express agreement in writing, in terms of the proviso to Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, waiving the ineligibility of the sole arbitrator or the right to object under Section 12(5).

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Arbitration — Unilateral appointment of sole arbitrator — Awards set aside; execution applications dismissed. Batch of Commercial Execution Applications / Execution Applications (Serial Nos. 902, 904 to 933, 935 to 949, 951 to 1108, 1110, 1112 to 1123, 1128 to 1141, 1143 to 1151), High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction), Abhay Ahuja J., 24 April 2026: acting in view of the Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others vs. Airports Authority of India, 2026 SCC Online SC 7 (unilateral appointment of arbitrator is void ab initio; ineligibility can be raised at any stage, even in execution), and on the finding by the office of the Prothonotary & Senior Master that the appointment of the sole arbitrator in all these matters was unilateral, the respective arbitral awards stand set aside, and the Commercial Execution Applications / Execution Applications, the connected Interim Applications and the Chamber Summons, if any, stand dismissed / disposed. It is open to the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings in accordance with law, with the period from the invocation of the arbitration till the date of this order excluded for limitation purposes. Liberty to apply is reserved where an express agreement in writing exists in terms of the proviso to Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 waiving the sole arbitrator's ineligibility or the right to object under Section 12(5).

902, 904 to 933, 935 to 949, 951 to 1108, 1110,1112 to 1123, 1129 to 1141, 1143 to 1151.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

SERIAL NOS. 902, 904 TO 933, 935 TO 949,951 TO 1108, 1110, 1112 TO 1123, 1128 TO 1141, 1143 TO 1151

Ms. Bijal Gogri i/b O.M. Gujar Law Chambers for the Applicant in Sr. Nos.902, 904, 933, 936, 937, 947, 948, 951, 986, 1019, 1108, 1110, 1112 to 1115, 1129 & 1142.

Ms. Bijal Gogri i/b GNP Legal for the Applicant in Sr. Nos. 939,940 & 942.

Mr. Pawan Kulmakar i/b SG Legal & Associates for the Applicant in Sr. Nos. 945, 952, 975, 976, 977, 983, 984 & 987. None present in other matters.

CORAM : ABHAY AHUJA, J. DATE : 24^th April 2026

PC:-

All these matters have been listed in view of the decision of the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bhadra International (India) Pvt.

Ltd. and Others vs. Airports Authority of India¹ where the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed that unilateral appointment of arbitrator is void ab initio and the ineligibility can be raised at any stage and even in execution.

Since in all these matters it has been found by the office of the Prothonotary & Senior Master of this Court that the appointment of the sole arbitrator has been unilateral, in view of the above decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the respective arbitral awards stand set aside

1 2026 SCC Online SC 7

Nikita Gadgil 1/2

Digitally signed by NIKITA NIKITA YOGESH YOGESH GADGIL GADGIL Date: 2026.04.24 18:08:42 +0530

902, 904 to 933, 935 to 949, 951 to 1108, 1110,1112 to 1123, 1129 to 1141, 1143 to 1151.doc

and the Commercial Execution Applications / Execution Applications, and the connected Interim Applications as well as the Chamber Summons, if any, accordingly stand dismissed / disposed.

It would be open to the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings in accordance with law.

As far as limitation is concerned, the period from the invocation of the arbitration till today be excluded in initiating fresh arbitration proceedings.

Liberty to apply in the event there exists an express agreement in writing in terms of proviso to Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the “said Act”) waiving the ineligibility of the sole arbitrator or the right to object under Section 12(5) of the said Act.

(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)

Nikita Gadgil 2/2