The Commercial Arbitration Petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioners did not appear. The Court Receiver's Report regarding discharge of expenses was also disposed of per its terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9-CARBP-689-2019 (OS).DOC
1/3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 689 OF 2019
Sharifabai Kutubuddin Wakf-Ul-Aulad Trust And 3 Ors. ...Petitioners
Versus
Charul N Doshi ...Respondent
WITH
COURT RECEIVER REPORT NO.88 OF 2025
IN
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 689 OF 2019
Sharifabai Kutubuddin Wakf-Ul-Aulad Trust And 3 Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Charul N Doshi & Ors. ...Respondents
None for the Petitioners.
Mr. Deepak S. Bhalerao, Second Assistant to Court Receiver, present.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
P.C.
clear that the Petitioners are not desirous of prosecuting the Petition. The captioned Commercial Arbitration Petition is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
Vaibhav
9-CARBP-689-2019 (OS).DOC
2/3
Vaibhav
9-CARBP-689-2019 (OS).DOC
3/3
subsequent to 8th October 2021 shall be paid by Generic Engineering
Construction Projects Ltd.
[ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.]
Vaibhav
Sharifabai Kutubuddin Wakf-Ul-Aulad Trust
Charul N Doshi
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
