Allowed

Bisleri International Private Limited v. Uday Thakur

Bombay HC15 Apr 2026CRR/450/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The dispute was settled between parties. The defendant admitted to the decree. The suit was decreed as prayed in the plaint. The leave petition and interim application were allowed/disposed. The court receiver was discharged.

What did the court decide?

Suit decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a)-(e) of the plaint. Leave petition allowed. Court receiver discharged without passing accounts. Interim application disposed of.

Bisleri International Private Limited vs Uday Thakur — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Digitally signed by SHAGUFTA SHAGUFTA QUTBUDDIN QUTBUDDIN PATHAN PATHAN Date:

¶2

501-COMIP-L-21256-2025-GROUP.doc

¶3

Date: 2026.04.16 18:32:25 +0530

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶5

IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION

¶6

COMMERCIAL IP SUIT (L) NO.21256 OF 2025 WITH

¶7

COURT RECEIVER’S REPORT NO.450 OF 2025 WITH LEAVE PETITION (L) NO.21466 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.22060 OF 2025 IN COMMERCIAL IP SUIT (L) NO.21256 OF 2025

¶8

Bisleri International Private Limited ...Plaintiff

¶9

Versus

¶10

Uday Thakur ...Defendant

¶11

Mr. Siddhant Gupta i/b Mr. Vinod A. Bhagat for the Plaintiff

¶12

Defendant Mr. Uday Thakur is present in-person

¶13

——————

¶14

CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.

¶15

DATE : APRIL 15, 2026

¶16

P. C. :

¶17

1. Not on Board. Upon mentioning, taken on Production Board.

¶18

2. This Court is informed that the dispute has been settled between

¶19

the parties. The consent terms are tendered, which are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The consent terms are signed by the Constituted Attorney of the Plaintiff and the Defendant. The Defendant is present personally in Court and reiterates the terms of

¶20

1/2

¶21

SQ Pathan

¶22

501-COMIP-L-21256-2025-GROUP.doc

¶23

the consent terms. His identity is verified from the Aadhaar Card, which is placed on record. The Defendant submits to the decree on admission

¶24

in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) of the plaint. The statement made in the consent terms is accepted as an undertaking given to this Court.

¶25

3. The Suit is decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) of the plaint.

¶26

4. Refund of court fees as per rules.

¶27

5. Court Receiver’s report is disposed of. Court Receiver is discharged without passing of accounts. All costs, charges and expenses of the Court Receiver to be paid by the Plaintiff within a period of eight days from the date of demand being raised by the Court Receiver.

¶28

6. The Interim Application (L) No.22060 of 2025 does not survive for consideration and stands disposed of.

¶29

LEAVE PETITION (L) NO.21466/2025

¶30

7. As the dispute has been settled between the parties, the Leave Petition is allowed.

¶31

[SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]

¶32

2/2

¶33

SQ Pathan

Bisleri International Private Limited v. Uday Thakur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bisleri International Private Limited v. Uday Thakur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satpal Singh.J Chawla vs Subhash D Sharma and Ors.

Nayara Energy Ltd. vs Ms Mahendra Sale Services

Cello Plastic Industrial Works vs Royal Plast

Dr. Vijay Gopal Kulkarni and 2 Ors. Vs Manisha Dilip Kulkarni

Bisleri International Private Limited vs Uday Thakur

Phonographic Performance Limited vs Star Health And Allied Insurance Company Ltd.