Bisleri International Private Limited vs Dnyanjyot Foods and Beverages Private Limited — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Bisleri International Private Limited vs Dnyanjyot Foods and Beverages Private Limited — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Suit decreed on admission in favour of the Plaintiff in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) of the Plaint, with the Consent Terms accepted as undertakings to the Court; Court Receiver discharged without passing of accounts with its costs payable by the Plaintiff within eight days upon demand; pending applications disposed of; Leave Petition No. 226 of 2025 allowed.

Ratio / Principle

The statements made in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings given to this Court.

Key takeaways

The suit is decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) of the Plaint, on the Defendant submitting to decree on admission pursuant to the settled Consent Terms.ratio¶21
Court Receiver's Report is disposed of and the Court Receiver is discharged without passing of accounts.ratio¶22
All costs, charges and expenses of the Court Receiver are to be paid by the Plaintiff within a period of eight days upon demand being raised by the Court Receiver.ratio

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Commercial IP Suit No. 716 of 2025 (Bisleri International Private Limited v. Dnyanjyot Foods and Beverages Private Limited), High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Commercial Division), before Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J., decided on 13 March 2026: the dispute having been settled, the signed Consent Terms were taken on record (marked 'X') and their statements accepted as undertakings given to the Court; the Director of the Defendant, personally present, submitted to decree on admission, and the suit was decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) of the Plaint. The Court Receiver's Report was disposed of and the Court Receiver discharged without passing of accounts, its costs, charges and expenses being payable by the Plaintiff within eight days upon demand; pending applications stood disposed of, and companion Leave Petition No. 226 of 2025 was allowed as the suit stood settled. The text does not disclose the content of the prayer clauses or the statutory basis of the dispute.

2026:BHC-OS:6504

902 COMIP-716-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION

COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 716 OF 2025

Bisleri International Private Limited ...Plaintiff

Versus

Dnyanjyot Foods and Beverages Private Limited ...Defendant

WITH LEAVE PETITION NO. 226 OF 2025

Mr. Vinod Bhagat, Mr. Siddhant Gupta i/b Mr. Vinod Bhagat for Plaintiff. Mr. Shubham Awari, director of Defendant. Ms. Chipkar, Mr. Dhiraj D. Zatke, representatives of office of Court Receiver.

——————

CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : MARCH 13, 2026

P. C. :

Commercial IP Suit No. 716 of 2025 :

1. This Court is informed that the dispute has been settled between the parties.

2. The Consent Terms are tendered which are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The Consent Terms are signed by the constituted attorney of the Plaintiff and by Director of Defendant. The Director of the Defendant is present personally and reiterates the

terms of the Consent Terms. He submits to decree on admission in

1 of 2

Sairaj

902 COMIP-716-2025.doc

terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) of the plaint. The statements made in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertaking given to this Court. The Board Resolutions are annexed to the Consent Terms.

3. The suit is decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) of the Plaint.

4. Court Receiver’s Report is disposed of. Court Receiver is discharged without passing of accounts. All costs, charges and expenses of the Court Receiver to be paid by Plaintiff within period of eight days upon demand being raised by Court Receiver.

5. In view of above, nothing survives for consideration in pending applications, if any, and the same stand disposed of.

Leave Petition No. 226 of 2025 :

6. As the suit has been settled between the parties, Leave Petition is allowed.

[SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]

2 of 2

Sairaj