Disposed¶24

Nurain Sushikshit Berozgaracnchi Saha. Sanstha Amravati, Thr. Secretary, Mukaddis Husain v. Sant Gadge Baba Amravati Vidyapeeth, Thr. Registrar, Amravati and Anr.

Bombay HC20 Feb 2026CAW/2923/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition disposed of as infructuous — challenge to work order dated 26.11.2024 issued by Sant Gadge Baba Amravati Vidyapeeth (respondent No.1) in favour of respondent No.2 — work order executed and period over — petitioner at liberty to approach Civil Court for damages — contentions kept open — mootness/infructuity — alternate civil remedy for damages — Nurain Shshikshit Berozgaranchi Sanstha Amravati.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of as infructuous; petitioner granted liberty to approach the Civil Court for claiming damages from respondent No.1; contentions in the writ petition kept open; pending applications, if any, disposed of. ¶24

Nurain Sushikshit Berozgaracnchi Saha. Sanstha Amravati, Thr. Secretary, Mukaddis Husain vs Sant Gadge Baba Amravati Vidyapeeth, Thr. Registrar, Amravati and Anr. — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:BHC-NAG:3034-DB

¶2

104-WP-6675-2024.odt 1/2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 6675 OF 2024 WITH

¶5

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2923 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6675 OF 2024

¶6

Nurain Shshikshit Berozgaranchi Saha. Sanstha Amravati, Thr. Secretary, Mukaddis Husain

¶7

Vs.

¶8

Sant Gadge Baba Amravati Vidypeeth, Thr. Registrar, Amravati and Anr.

¶9

Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram,__________________________________________________________________________ appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.

¶10

Mr. Parvez Mirza, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs Gauri Venkatraman, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

¶11

CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ. DATE : 20th FEBRUARY, 2026.

¶12

Heard Mr. Parvez Mirza, learned counsel for the

¶13

petitioner and Mrs. Gauri Venkatramanm, learned counsel for respondent No.1.

¶14

Mrs. Gauri Venkatramanm has invited our attention to

¶15

the work order dated 26^th November 2024 which is at record page No.184- Annexure- R1-13.

¶16

Mrs. Gauri Venkatramanm, learned counsel for respondent No.1 has made a statement before this Court that the work order which was issued in favour of respondent No.2

¶17

104-WP-6675-2024.odt 2/2

¶18

has been executed and the period mentioned in the work order is over.

¶19

Mr. Parvez Mirza, learned counsel for the petitioner, however, tried to insist for grant of damages in view of alleged illegalities committed by respondent No.1 while issuing work order to the respondent No.2.

¶20

In view of the aforesaid submissions, we dispose of the present petition as infructuous as the challenge in the present writ petition was to the work order issued by the respondent No.1 to respondent No.2, whose period is now over. However,

¶21

the petitioner is at liberty to approach Civil Court for claiming damages from respondent No.1.

¶22

Needless to mention that the contentions raised in the

¶23

present writ petition are kept open.

¶24

Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.

¶25

In view of the disposal of the petition, pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

¶26

( RAJ D. WAKODE, J.) (ANIL S. KILOR, J.)

¶27

MJ Jadhav

Nurain Sushikshit Berozgaracnchi Saha. Sanstha Amravati, Thr. Secretary, Mukaddis Husain v. Sant Gadge Baba Amravati Vidyapeeth, Thr. Registrar, Amravati and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nurain Sushikshit Berozgaracnchi Saha. Sanstha Amravati, Thr. Secretary, Mukaddis Husain v. Sant Gadge Baba Amravati Vidyapeeth, Thr. Registrar, Amravati and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balkrishna Bahuuddeshiy Sanstha, Nagpur, Thr. Director, Purushottam B. Bhalerao vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, School Education and Sports Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

United Bank Employees Union, Thr. General Secy., Kamal Rangwani and Anr. vs the Assistant General Manager and Disciplinary Authority, Mumbai and Ors.

Sau. Kshama Anil Pitade vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Director of Town Planning, State of Maharashtra, Pune and Others

Balkrishna Bahuuddeshiy Sanstha, Nagpur, Thr. Director, Purushottam B. Bhalerao vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, School Education and Sports Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Chandrakala Ashok Hinge and Another vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Home Department, Mumbai and Another

Hakim Jafar Sheikh vs the Maha. State Electricity Distri. Co. Ltd., Thr. Chairman and Managing Director and Ors.