Arbitration petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Court was informed an arbitrator had been appointed under Section 11 and ad-interim relief converted to interim relief under Section 17; nothing survived and the petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
33-CARBP-435-25.doc
Sayali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI
Digitally signed by SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI Date: 2026.06.11 17:22:28 +0530
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO.435 OF 2025
Meroform India Pvt Ltd … Petitioner V/s. Tata Projects Limited and Others … Respondents
Ms. Saloni Manjrekar i/b HN Legal, for Petitioner. Ms. Vibhuti K. i/b Sushma Nagaraj, for Respondent – Tata Projects Ltd.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : JUNE 11, 2026
P.C.:
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Meroform India Pvt Ltd
Tata Projects Limited
Others
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
