Ingram Micro India Private Limited vs NxtGen Datacenter and Cloud Technologies Private Limited

This is a petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ( Arbitration Act ) for seeking interim measures before commencement of the arbitral proceedings.

¶12

As the hearing of the petition progressed, the learned counsel appearing for Respondent submits that there is an arbitration agreement between the parties and instead of this Court deciding the prayer for interim measures, Arbitral Tribunal can be constituted and the Tribunal can adjudicate the prayer for interim measures. In my view, the suggestion given by the learned counsel for the Respondents appears to be fair.

¶13

The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the present petition be permitted to be converted into Section 17 application of the Arbitration Act.

¶14

PAGE NO. 1 of 3

¶15

16 FEBRUARY 2026

¶16

Neeta Sawant 31-CARBP-316-2025.docx

¶17

Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, the following order is passed :

¶18

(A) Smt. Justice Mridula Bhatkar , Former Judge of Bombay High Court is appointed as Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes and differences between the parties. The contact details of the Arbitrator are as under:

¶19

Ofce Addressfi :- Flat No.501, “Saket”, Near Balmohan

¶20

Vidyamandir, Dr. M.B. Raut Marg, Shivaji Park, Dadar (W), Mumbai - 400028

¶21

Email ID :- [email protected]

¶22

(B) A copy of this order be communicated to the learned sole Arbitrator by the Advocate for the Petitioner within a period of one week from the date of uploading of this order. The Petitioner shall provide the contact and communication particulars of the parties to the Arbitral Tribunal alongwith a copy of this order.

¶23

(C) The learned sole Arbitrator is requested to forward the statutory Statement of Disclosure under Section 11(8) read with Section 12(1) of the Act to the parties within a period of 2 weeks from receipt of a copy of this order.

¶24

(D) The parties shall appear before the learned sole Arbitrator on such date and at such place as indicated by her to obtain appropriate direction with regard to conduct of the arbitration including fixing a schedule for pleadings, examination of witnesses, if any, schedule of hearings etc.

¶25

PAGE NO. 2 of 3

¶26

16 FEBRUARY 2026

¶27

Neeta Sawant 31-CARBP-316-2025.docx

¶28

(E) The fees of the sole Arbitrator shall be as prescribed under the Bombay High Court (Fee Payable to Arbitrators) Rules, 2018 and the arbitral costs and fees of the Arbitrator shall be borne by the parties in equal proportion and shall be subject to the final Award that may be passed by the Tribunal.

¶29

The petition is permitted to be converted into application under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act which shall be decided by the ld.arbitrator on its own merits.

¶30

All rights and contentions of the parties are expressly kept open to be raised before the Arbitral Tribunal.

¶31

With the above directions, the Commercial Arbitration Petition is disposed of.

¶32

Digitally signed by NEETA NEETA SHAILESH SHAILESH SAWANT SAWANT Date: 2026.02.18 18:00:44 +0530

¶33

[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]

¶34

PAGE NO. 3 of 3

¶35

16 FEBRUARY 2026

Ingram Micro India Private Limited v. NxtGen Datacenter and Cloud Technologies Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ingram Micro India Private Limited v. NxtGen Datacenter and Cloud Technologies Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mumbai District Central Co-Op Bank Ltd. vs Co-Operative Bank Employees Union

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited vs Aegis Logistics Pvt. Ltd.

Shree Dev Shasan Jain Shwetambar Murtipujak Trust vs Veer Tower Cooperative Housing Society Ltd.

Scil Capital India Private Limited vs Waycool Foods and Products Private Limited

Scil Capital India Private Limited vs Waycool Foods and Products Private Limited

Vineet Kamal Kedia vs Vaibhav Kamal Kedia