Tata Capital Limited v. Dadarwal Road Lines
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 9 – Interim measures before commencement of arbitral proceedings
Case brief
What is this about?
Tata Capital Limited v. Dadarwal Road Lines; Bombay High Court (OOCJ), Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 181 of 2025; Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996; pre-arbitration interim measures; ad-interim order dated 21 January 2025 covering prayer clauses 40(a), (e), (g), (h); sole Arbitrator constituted by order dated 7 April 2026; ad-interim measures continued as interim measures during arbitral proceedings till final Award; rights and contentions open; further interim measures may be pressed before Tribunal; petition disposed of on 21 April 2026 by Justice Sandeep V. Marne; counsel: Saurabh Oka for Petitioner.
What did the court decide?
Ad-interim measures granted vide order dated 21 January 2025 continued to operate as interim measures during pendency of arbitral proceedings and till making of the final Award; all rights and contentions of the parties specifically kept open; Applicant/Petitioner at liberty to press for further interim measures before the Arbitral Tribunal, if necessary.