Cidco Aurangabad through Its Administrator v. Manikchand Ghisulal and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: restoration of first appeal; Registrar (Judicial) order dated 19.11.2019 set aside; abatement set aside; legal representatives/legal heirs brought on record; condonation of delay (2324 days; 5639 days); CIDCO Aurangabad through its Administrator v. State of Maharashtra; Manikchand Ghisulal Phulpagar; Bombay High Court Aurangabad Bench; Arun R. Pedneker, J.; FA/1360/2003; First Appeal No. 696 of 2004; Civil Application Nos. 5267 and 5268 of 2026; Civil Application Stamp No. 8879 of 2026. Procedural order of practical use for tracking revival of appeals struck off by the Registry and revocation of abatement on death of parties; contains no substantive legal holdings, statute references or cited cases.
What did the court decide?
All three civil applications allowed without objection: (i) legal representatives of the original claimant/s in First Appeal No. 696 of 2004 brought on record, delay condoned, abatement, if any, set aside; (ii) the First Appeal (FA/1360/2003) restored by setting aside the order of the Registrar (Judicial) dated 19.11.2019, delay of 2324 days condoned; (iii) legal representatives of Respondent No. 1 brought on record, abatement, if any, set aside, delay of 5639 days condoned.