Satyanarayan Dattaram Patil and Others vs The Project Director National Highway Authority of India and Anr.

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajit Baburao Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. J. Rahate Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Rajendra D. Sanap

¶42

WITH

¶43

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3608 OF 2026 IN ARB/30/2025

¶44

AND

¶45

910 ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 31 OF 2025 VIJAY SHARAD CHANDRATIKE AND OTHERS VERSUS

¶46

THE PROJECT DIRECTOR,NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA

¶47

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajit Baburao Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. J. Rahate

¶48

WITH

¶49

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3603 OF 2026 IN ARB/31/2025

¶50

AND

¶51

4 904-924

¶52

911 ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 32 OF 2025 KHANIJABI SHAIKH SIRAJ AND OTHERS

¶53

VERSUS

¶54

THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA

¶55

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajit Baburao Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. J. Rahate Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. N. T. Bhagat

¶56

WITH

¶57

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3605 OF 2026 IN ARB/32/2025

¶58

AND

¶59

912 ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 33 OF 2025 MUNISH RATANLAL SHARMA AND OTHERS

¶60

VERSUS

¶61

THE PROJECT DIRECTOR,NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANOTHERS

¶62

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajit Baburao Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. J. Rahate Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Rajesh H. Mewara

¶63

WITH

¶64

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3599 OF 2026 IN ARB/33/2025

¶65

AND

¶66

913 ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 34 OF 2025 SATYANARAYAN DATTARAM PATIL AND OTHERS

¶67

VERSUS

¶68

THE PROJECT DIRECTOR,NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND OTHERS

¶69

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajit Baburao Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. J. Rahate

¶70

5 904-924

¶71

Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Ms. Mayuti G. Kasturkar

¶72

WITH

¶73

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3600 OF 2026 IN ARB/34/2025

¶74

AND

¶75

914 ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 35 OF 2025 YADNYAVIR ANANDRAO KAVADE

¶76

VERSUS

¶77

THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR.

¶78

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajit Baburao Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. J. Rahate Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Rohit Sarvadnya

¶79

WITH

¶80

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3606 OF 2026 IN ARB/35/2025

¶81

AND

¶82

915 ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 36 OF 2025 ASHABAI PRALHAD KOLHE AND ANOTHER

¶83

VERSUS

¶84

THE PROJECT DIRECTOR,NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR.

¶85

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajit Baburao Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. J. Rahate Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Nandkishor U. Yadav

¶86

WITH

¶87

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3601 OF 2026 IN ARB/36/2025

¶88

AND

¶89

6 904-924

¶90

916 ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 37 OF 2025 SATISH BUDHAJIRAO SHINDE AND ANR.

¶91

VERSUS

¶92

THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR.

¶93

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajit Baburao Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. J. Rahate Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Rajesh H. Mewara

¶94

AND

¶95

917 ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 38 OF 2025 SUBHASH RAMCHANDRA AGRAWAL AND OTHERS

¶96

VERSUS

¶97

THE PROJECT DIRECTOR,NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR.

¶98

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajit Baburao Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. J. Rahate Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Ms. Mayuri G. Kasturkar

¶99

AND

¶100

918 ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2025 SACHIN SUMATILAL JAVHERI AND OTHERS

¶101

VERSUS

¶102

THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR.

¶103

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajit Baburao Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. J. Rahate Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Akshay D. Kulkarni

¶104

AND

¶105

7 904-924

¶106

919 ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 40 OF 2025 DILIP AMBADAS VETAL AND OTHERS

¶107

VERSUS

¶108

THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR.

¶109

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajit Baburao Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. J. Rahate Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. U. B. Bondar

¶110

AND

¶111

920 ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 41 OF 2025 SUSHILABAI RAGHUNATH JANJAL AND OTHERS

¶112

VERSUS

¶113

THE PROJECT DIRECTOR,NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

¶114

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajit Baburao Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. J. Rahate Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Rohit S. Sarvadnya

¶115

AND

¶116

921 ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 42 OF 2025 SHILA SUBHASH AGRAWAL AND OTHERS

¶117

VERSUS

¶118

THE PROJECT DIRECTOR,NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND OTHERS

¶119

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajit Baburao Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. J. Rahate Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. U. B. Bondar

¶120

AND

¶121

8 904-924

¶122

922 ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 44 OF 2025 VISHWANATH MURGAPPA SINGARE AND OTHERS

¶123

VERSUS

¶124

THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

¶125

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajit Baburao Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. J. Rahate Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Krushna S. Solanke

¶126

AND

¶127

923 ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 45 OF 2025 KALPANA SHANKAR UBALE AND OTHERS

¶128

VERSUS

¶129

THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

¶130

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajit Baburao Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. J. Rahate Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Krushna S. Solanke

¶131

AND

¶132

924 ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 47 OF 2025 SHAMIYODDIN WALIYYODDIN HASHMI

¶133

VERSUS

¶134

THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR.

¶135

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajit Baburao Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. J. Rahate Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Avinash R. Borulkar

¶136

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 27.03.2026

¶137

9 904-924

¶138

PER COURT:

¶139

Heard.

¶140

The Arbitration Applications are filed for extension of the mandate under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

¶141

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Jagdeep Chowgule Vs. Sheela Chowgule and others, dated 29.01.2026 , relying upon the Judgment of Chief Engineer (NH) PWD (Roads) Vs. BSC&C and C JV, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1801, has observed that the power under Sub-Section 29A of the Arbitration Act vests in the Court as defined in Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration Act. It is the principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction in a district which includes a High Court provided the High Court has ordinary original civil jurisdiction.

¶142

This Court in case of National Highway Authority of India and others Vs. Suresh Pardharinath Matre and others, MANU/MH/2637/2026 : Arbitration Appeal No.10 of 2026 with connected matters, dated 18.03.2026 has taken a view that Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has no application to the arbitration proceedings initiated under Section 3(G)(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956. This court in the case

¶143

10 904-924

¶144

of Suresh Matre (supra) has observed at Paragraph No.49, as

¶145

under:

¶146

"49. This Court for the reasons discussed above, holds that Section 29A of the Act, which provides for a time limit for the conclusion of arbitration proceedings extension of mandate of Arbitrator, reduction of fees of arbitrator and for substitution of the arbitrator, would not apply to an arbitrator appointed under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act."

¶147

In view of the above, all the Applications are disposed of

¶148

with direction to the Arbitrator to decide the pending Arbitration Applications expeditiously.

¶149

In view of disposal of the Arbitration Applications, the

¶150

interim Civil Applications are also disposed of.

¶151

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.]

¶152

marathe

Satyanarayan Dattaram Patil and Others v. The Project Director National Highway Authority of India and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyanarayan Dattaram Patil and Others v. The Project Director National Highway Authority of India and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaikh Latif Kamal vs M/s Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd. Through Poa Mr. Amit Narayan Paitl and Anr.

The Project Director, Zilla Gramin Vikas Yantrana, Osmanabad and Ors. vs Pandit Shahaji Sutar and Anr.

Rajaram Kondiram Gaikwad Thr Lrs Prayagbai Sominath Jadhav and Others vs Bhika Rajaram Paikade Since Deceased Thr Lrs Laxman Bhika Paikade Deceased and Others

Rameshwar Mukanlal Charkha and Ors. vs the State of Mahrashtra and Ors.

Yadnyavir Anandrao Kavade vs The Project Director, National Highway Authority of India and Anr.

Khanijabi Shaikh Siraj and Others vs The Project Director, National Highway Authority of India