Dismissed¶4
Raj Parmeshwar Panchal v. State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCBA/3951/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Dismissed for want of prosecution - Bombay HC Bail Application No. 3951 of 2025, Raj Parmeshwar Panchal v. State of Maharashtra; permitted amendment (impleading Victim as Respondent No.2, additional charge-sheet on record) never carried out; copy not supplied to APP Mayur S. Sonavane; Dr. Neela Gokhale J.; decided 29 January 2026; no statutes or precedent cases cited; no advocate present for Applicant.
What did the court decide?
From the record it appeared that the amendment as permitted had not been carried out and that the Applicant was not interested in pursuing the Application. ¶3