Disposed

Tata Capital Limited v. Genset Electrical Solutions International Private Limited

Bombay HC21 Jan 2026ARBAP/1/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order in an arbitration application arising under a Loan-Guarantee Agreement. The court appointed a sole arbitrator on the basis of the parties' express agreement and directed the filing of the Statement of Disclosure.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Ms. Shruti Tulpule as Sole Arbitrator; disposal of Application No. 1 of 2026.

Tata Capital Limited vs Genset Electrical Solutions International… — Arbitration | Bombay HC (2026)

¶1

Neeta Sawant 7-ARBAP-1-2026.docx

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2026

¶4

TATA Capital Ltd.

¶5

: VERSUS : Genset Electrical Solutions International Private Limited

¶6

…..APPLICANT

¶7

….RESPONDENT

¶8

Ms. Mahtab Katariya i/b. Katariya Law Associates LLP, for the Applicant.

¶9

CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED : 21 JANUARY 2026.

¶10

P.C :

¶11

Heard Ms. Katariya, the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant.

¶12

She tenders Affidavit of private service which is taken on record. The Affidavit indicates that the application was served on the Respondents vide notice dated 26 December 2025 by speed post and the postal tracking report indicates that the packets have been delivered on the Respondents. Thereafter, separate intimations dated 14 January 2026 are served on the Respondents indicating today’s date of hearing, both by speed-post, as well as by email. The postal tracking receipt indicates that even notice dated 14 January 2026 has been served through speed-post. Upon receipt of email, Respondents have responded by way of email on 17 January 2026 raising certain conditions on merits. They have assured repayment of balance amount after completion of the pending project. Respondents have not disputed existence of Arbitration Agreement.

¶13

PAGE NO. 1 of 3

¶14

WEDNESDAY, 21 JANUARY 2026

¶15

Neeta Sawant 7-ARBAP-1-2026.docx

¶16

The disputes and differences between the parties have arisen out of Loan-Guarantee Agreement dated 13 December 2024 which contains arbitration clause. In view of express agreement between the parties, it would be just and proper to constitute Arbitral Tribunal of a sole Arbitrator. Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following order :

¶17

(A) Ms. Shruti Tulpule, an Advocate of this Court is appointed as Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes and differences between the parties arising out of an LoanGuarantee Agreement referred to above. The contact details of the Arbitrator are as under :

¶18

Email ID :- [email protected]

¶19

Mobile No.:- 98234 74226

¶20

(B) A copy of this order be communicated to the learned sole Arbitrator by the Advocate for the Applicant within a period of one week from the date of uploading of this order. The Applicant shall provide the contact and communication particulars of the parties to the Arbitral Tribunal alongwith a copy of this order.

¶21

(C) The learned sole Arbitrator is requested to forward the statutory Statement of Disclosure under Section 11(8) read with Section 12(1) of the Act to the parties within a period of 2 weeks from receipt of a copy of this order.

¶22

(D) The parties shall appear before the learned sole Arbitrator on such date and at such place as indicated by her , to obtain appropriate direction with regard to conduct of the arbitration including fixing a schedule for pleadings, examination of witnesses, if any, schedule of hearings etc.

¶23

(E) The fees of the sole Arbitrator shall be as prescribed under the Bombay High Court (Fee Payable to Arbitrators)

¶24

PAGE NO. 2 of 3

¶25

WEDNESDAY, 21 JANUARY 2026

¶26

Neeta Sawant 7-ARBAP-1-2026.docx

¶27

Rules, 2018 and the arbitral costs and fees of the Arbitrator shall be borne by the parties in equal portion and shall be subject to the final Award that may be passed by the Tribunal.

¶28

All rights and contentions of the parties are expressly kept open to be raised before the Arbitral Tribunal.

¶29

With the above directions, the Arbitration Application is disposed of.

¶30

[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]

¶31

Digitally signed by NEETA NEETA SHAILESH SHAILESH SAWANT SAWANT Date: 2026.01.23 18:01:12 +0530

¶32

PAGE NO. 3 of 3

¶33

WEDNESDAY, 21 JANUARY 2026

Tata Capital Limited v. Genset Electrical Solutions International Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tata Capital Limited v. Genset Electrical Solutions International Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamal R Bulchandani vs Central Depository Services India Ltd.

Vraj Prime Developers vs Varsha Co-Operative Housing Society Limited

Damodar Ropeways and Infra Limited Formerly Known as Indian Ropeway and Engineering Co. Limited vs Shree Jivdani Temple Trust Also Known as Shree Jeevdani Devi Mandir Trust

Westbuild Realty Pvt. Ltd. vs New Sputnik Cooperative Housing Society

Narang Realty Pravate Limited vs Sts Co. Operative Housing Federation Society Limited

Ambit Finvest vs Kamaraj Chinnasamy