Anil Suresh Lede vs State of Maharashtra through Pavni Police Station, District Bhandara and Anr.

¶1

2026:BHC-NAG:2141-DB

Judgment

1

10 apl569.25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶6

CRIMINAL APPLICATION APL NO.569/2025

¶7

Anil Suresh Lede, occupation: driver, MSRTC, age: 39 years, resident of ward No.01, Madaipeth, Adyal, tal.Pawani, district Bhandara. ….. Applicant. :: V E R S U S ::

¶8

State of Maharashtra, through Pavni Police Station, district Bhandara.

¶9

Bhiksuk Kandlik Vanjari, age: 55 years, occupation: farming, resident of Bhendala, tahsil Pauni, . district Bhandara. ….. Non-applicants ============================== Shri A.R.Fule, Counsel for the Applicant. Shri Nikhil Joshi, APP for Non-applicant No.1/State.

¶10

============================== CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATE : 03/02/2026

¶11

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶12

Heard learned counsel Shri A.R.Fule for the applicant

¶13

and learned APP Shri Nikhil Joshi for the non-applicant No.1/

¶14

State. Admit . Heard finally by consent.

.....2/-

Judgment

10 apl569.25

2

By this application, the applicant is seeking quashing of FIR in connection with Crime No.251/2021 registered for offences under Sections 279, 304-A, 337, and 338 of the IPC read with 134, 184, and 177 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

¶20

The crime is registered on the basis of a report lodged by Bhiksuk Kandlik Vanjari on allegations that on 7.9.2021, at about 4:00 pm, he was proceeding from road. At the relevant time, injured Kawalu and Raju Talmale were proceeding on motorcycle. At the relevant time, ST Bus bearing registration No.MH-40/Y/5821 was driven by its driver in rash and negligent manner and in excessive speed without considering traffic situation and dashed against the motorcycle, due to which Ashish succumbed to death. The motorcycle rider Kawalu and Rajesh have sustained grievous injuries. On the basis of the said report, the police registered the crime.

¶21

After registration of the crime, the investigating officer

¶22

has drawn spot panchanama and recorded statements of

.....3/-

Judgment

3

10 apl569.25

relevant witnesses and also collected medical certificate and after completion of the investigation, submitted chargesheet against the applicant.

¶28

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that as far

¶29

as involvement of the applicant is concerned, statements of passengers reveal that it was the applicant who was rash and negligent in driving the bus. He has invited my attention towards Mechanical Inspection Report of the vehicle and submitted that this report is also not supporting the case as it shows that accident has not happened due to mechanical defect in the motor vehicle. Thus, the report also shows that there was no mechanical defect in the vehicle. He submitted that statements of witnesses nowhere disclose that it was the applicant who was rash and negligent in driving the bus, but it was negligence on the part of the motorcycle driver and, therefore, the said accident has taken place. In view of that, the application deserves to be allowed.

.....4/-

Judgment

10 apl569.25

4

Per contra, learned APP for the State strongly opposed

¶35

the said contentions and submitted that even the Inspection Report nowhere shows that there was any defect or mechanical defect in the vehicle. The statements of the various witnesses disclose that it was the ST Bus Driver who came wrong side and gave dash to the motorcycle. At this stage, mini trial is not to be conducted by this court and a prima facie material is there to show involvement of the applicant. In view of that, the application deserves to be rejected.

¶36

On hearing both the sides and perusing the entire investigation papers, it reveals that allegations against the applicant are that the applicant, who was Bus Driver, who was driving the bus bearing registration No.MH-40/Y/5821, has driven the vehicle in rash and negligent manner and dashed against the motorcycle. The spot panchanama also discloses that the ST Bus Driver has taken his bus to the wrong side and given dash to the motorcycle, due which one person from

.....5/-

5

Judgment

10 apl569.25

the motorcycle succumbed to death and two persons have sustained injuries. The statements of passengers of the bus as well as other statements of witnesses disclose involvement of the applicant in the alleged incident.

¶42

Considering the entire material collected during the investigation, a prima facie case is made out against the applicant by applying principles which are to be considered while considering the application for quashing of the FIR and, therefore, the application being devoid of merits is liable to be rejected and the same is rejected.

¶43

Application stands disposed of .

¶44

( URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. )

¶45

!! BrWankhede !!

¶46

Signed by: Mr. B. R. Wankhede Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 09/02/2026 19:48:12

¶47

...../-

Anil Suresh Lede v. State of Maharashtra through Pavni Police Station, District Bhandara and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Suresh Lede v. State of Maharashtra through Pavni Police Station, District Bhandara and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Yunus Ayyub Sheikh vs the State of Maharashtra (through Katol Police Station)

Amol Rameshwar Shingane and Others vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Vibhuti Ankit Shrivastava vs State of Maharashtra through the Police Station Officer Police Station Wadi

Ravindra Pandurangji Nagpure vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Pso Ps Wardha Tah and Dist Wardha and Anr.

Ravindra S/O Vijay Palhade and 4 Others vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Ps Shegaon Icty Tq.Shegaon Dist.Buldhana and Another

Sandeep Sambhaji Sarkunde and Other vs State of Maharashtra Thr Pso., Ps Vasant Nagar Gramin Pusad Dist Yavatmal and Anr.