Disposed¶6

Kamaljeet Singh Gill S/O Raghbir Singh Gill and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC7 May 2026APL/1902/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of Criminal Application No. 1902 of 2024; Kamaljeet Singh Gill v. State of Maharashtra; Bombay High Court, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction; Ashwin D. Bhobe, J.; decision dated 7 May 2026; praecipe dated 07.05.2026; leave to withdraw with liberty to file afresh; inadvertent omission of details and averments; contentions of Respondent – State left open; Interim Application No. 4486 of 2025 disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Application No. 1902 of 2024 disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh application with all details; contentions of the Respondent – State left open; Interim Application No. 4486 of 2025 disposed of as nothing survived. ¶6

Kamaljeet Singh Gill S/O Raghbir Singh Gill and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr. — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

501-APL-1902-2024.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1902 OF 2024

¶4

WITH

¶5

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4486 OF 2025

¶6

Kamaljeet Singh Gill s/o Raghbir Singh Gill And Ors.

¶7

And Ors. … Applicants Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. … Respondents

¶8

Mr. Shrishail Sakarare, for the Applicants.

¶9

Mr. V. B. Konde-deshmukh, APP for the Respondent – State.

¶10

CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 7^th May, 2026.

¶11

P.C. :

¶12

This Application is circulated in view of the praecipe dated

¶13

07.05.2026. Same is taken on record and marked as “X” for identification.

¶14

Mr. Shrishail Sakhare, learned Advocate for the Applicants states that major amendments are required in the present Criminal Application No. 1902 of 2024. He states that the required details and averment in the Application were left out on account of an inadvertent mistake on his part. He therefore craves leave to withdraw the present Application with liberty to file an

¶15

Arjun

¶16

¶17

501-APL-1902-2024.doc

¶18

appropriate Application with all the details.

¶19

Mr. V. B. Konde-deshmukh, learned APP for the Respondent

¶20

– State, does not object to the request made by Mr. Shrishail Sakhare, learned Advocate for the Applicants.

¶21

In view of the statement made by Mr. Shrishail Sakhare, learned Advocate for the Applicant and the no objection given by

¶22

Mr. V. B. Konde-deshmukh, learned APP for the Respondent –

¶23

State, leave is granted to withdraw the present Application with liberty as prayed.

¶24

At the request of Mr. V. B. Konde-deshmukh, learned APP, all contentions of the Respondent – State, are left open.

¶25

Criminal Application No. 1902 of 2024 is disposed of as withdrawn.

¶26

In view of the disposal of the Criminal Application No. 1902 of 2024, nothing survives in Interim Application No. 4486 of 2025, the same is accordingly disposed of.

¶27

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)

¶28

Digitally signed by ARJUN ARJUN KRISHNA KRISHNA RODGE RODGE Date: 2026.05.09 13:49:08 +0530

¶29

Arjun

¶30

Kamaljeet Singh Gill S/O Raghbir Singh Gill and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamaljeet Singh Gill S/O Raghbir Singh Gill and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Karim Mohammad Yusuf vs State of Maharashtra

Suresh Turakhia and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Suresh Bulakiram Kalra vs State of Maharashtra instance at Bandra Police Station

Sachin Ramakant Waghmare vs State of Maharashtra

Balu Rambhau @ Ramji Ubale vs the State of Maharashtra

Amaanullah Azimullah Shaikh and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.