Partly allowed¶26

Pawan S/O Raju Kaithwas v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso, Ps Frezapura, Amravati

Bombay HC21 Jan 2026APL/1405/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench; APL No. 1405 of 2024; Pawan s/o Raju Kaithwas v. State of Maharashtra (P.S. Frezarpura, Amravati); bail cancellation; stay of Sessions Court order dated 3/9/2024 in Sessions Trial No. 306 of 2021; interim protection of 27/9/2024 continued till end of trial; trial at fag end, only IO remaining; single judge Pravin S. Patil; decided 21/01/2026; neutral citation 2026:BHC-NAG:1393; advocates R.M. Daga (applicant), A.M. Ghogre (APP).

What did the court decide?

Stay of the order dated 03/9/2024 passed by the District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati in Sessions Trial No. 306/2021 till final disposal of the criminal trial; rule made absolute in the aforesaid terms; no order as to costs. ¶26

Pawan S/O Raju Kaithwas vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso, Ps Frezapura, Amravati — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:BHC-NAG:1393

¶2

1 152 apl1405.2024.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 1405 OF 2024

¶5

APPLICANT: Pawan s/o Raju Kaithwas, Aged 20 years, Occu: Labsour, R/o Mahadeo Khori, Near Alaspure Kirana Shop, Amravati..

¶6

...V E R S U S…

¶7

RESPONDENT State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Police Station Frezarpura, District Amravati.

¶8

Mr. R.M. Daga, counsel for applicant.

¶9

Mr. A.M. Ghogre, APP for respondent/State.

¶10

CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J. DATE : 21/01 /2026

¶11

ORAL JUDGMENT :

¶12

Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of Mr. R.M. Daga, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. A.M. Ghogre, learned APP for respondent/State, the application is taken up for final hearing at the stage of admission.

¶13

By way of present application, the applicant challenges the order dated 3/9/2024 passed by the learned District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati, in Sessions Trial No. 306 of 2021, whereby learned Sessions Judge cancelled the bail

¶14

rkn

¶15

2 152 apl1405.2024.odt

¶16

granted to the present applicant vide order dated 16/12/2021, the present application is filed before this Court.

¶17

It is pointed out by the present applicant that, in the pending criminal trial, the charge-sheet has already been filed and the trial is already going on. It is further submitted that only the investigating officer remains to be examined before the trial Court.

¶18

In these circumstances, the applicant has prayed that if the interim protection granted by this Court vide order dated 27/09/2024 is continued during the pendency of the criminal trial, the present application may be disposed of.

¶19

Learned APP has strongly opposed this application. According to him, learned Sessions Judge, by recording the cogent reasons, has cancelled the bail of the applicant. As such, according to the learned APP, the applicant is not entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶20

Considering the observations made by learned Sessions Court in the order dated 3/9/2024, and after hearing the arguments of both the sides, it is an admitted fact that, the applicant was earlier granted bail by Session Court on 16/12/2021, and same was cancelled by the order dated 3/9/2024. Immediately thereafter, this Court, by order dated 27/9/2024, granted interim protection to the applicant during the pendency of the present application.

¶21

It is further pertinent to note that the trial which is going on is at the fag end, only the investigating officer remains to

¶22

rkn

¶23

3 152 apl1405.2024.odt

¶24

be examined as a witness in this case. In these circumstances, I am of the opinion that continuation of the order dated 27/9/2024 by this Court will sub-serve the ends of justice in the matter. Hence, I proceed to pass the following order:-

¶25

ORDER

¶26

a] The criminal application is partly allowed.

¶27

b] The order passed by the District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati vide order dated 03/9/2024 in Sessions Trial No. 306/2021 shall remain stayed till final disposal of the criminal trial.

¶28

Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. No order

¶29

as to costs.

¶30

(PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.)

¶31

rkn

Pawan S/O Raju Kaithwas v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso, Ps Frezapura, Amravati

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan S/O Raju Kaithwas v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso, Ps Frezapura, Amravati

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vaibhav Gopaldas Mundada (Husband) and 4 Others vs State of Maharashtr through Its P S O Police Station Pulgaon Deoli Wardha and Another

Sameer S/O Dilip Pathak and Others. vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Pso Ps Wadi

Dipak Vaijnath Lonkar and 2 Others vs the State of Maharashtra Thro. P.S.O. Ps Shantinagar Nagpur and Another

Harshmeetsingh S/O Manjeetsingh Bhatia and 3 Other vs the State of Maharashtra through Pso Ballarsha Ps Chandrapur and Another

Subhasm S/O Late Shrei Tarun Solanki and Another vs the State of Maharashtra Thru Mankapur Ps Nagpur and Another

Rehana W/O Mamun Rashid Patel and 3 Others vs the State of Maharashtra through Police Station Officer Ps Ramnagar Chandrapur and Another