The High Court of Judicature at Bombay permitted the withdrawal of Criminal Appeal No. 1101 of 2007 with liberty to file a fresh appeal before the Sessions Court, considering a recent Apex Court judgment.
Appeal permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file appeal before Sessions Court within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale
25-apeal-1101-2007.docx
MAMTA AMAR KALE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Criminal Appeal No. 1101 of 2007
M/s Jognia Explosive
… Appellant
versus
Bansilal B Mail and Anr. … Respondents
Mr Ronak M Utagikar i/b Mr T D Deshmukh, for the Appellant.
Ms M R Tidke, APP, for the Respondent / State.
Digitally signed byMAMTA AMAR KALE Date: 2026.03.0417:54:18 +0530
Coram: R.N. Laddha, J. Date: 4 March 2026
P.C.:
. The learned Counsel for the appellant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to file an appeal before the Sessions Court, in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Celestium Financial vs A Gnanasekaran, 2025 SCC OnLine 1320.
Page 1 of 2
4 March 2026
Mamta Kale
25-apeal-1101-2007.docx
Page 2 of 2
4 March 2026
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Celestium Financial vs A GnanasekaranReferred¶1
Celestium Financial vs A Gnanasekaran, 2025 SCC OnLine 1320 · Who else cites this
M/s Jognia Explosive
Bansilal B Mail and Anr
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
