Lucas Ignatius Tuscano v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application disposed as infructuous — High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction; Cri. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 889 of 2026; applicant Lucas Ignatius Tuscano; respondents The State of Maharashtra and Anr.; coram R.N. Laddha, J.; decided 7 April 2026; applicant arrested during pendency of the application, so nothing survived; counsel: Amol B Jagtap (applicant), Arfan Sait APP (State), Ranjit A Agashe a/w Vinsha Acharya i/b Pranil Lahigade (Respondent No.2); PSI Deepak Hol, Pairavi Officer, Dr D B Marg Police Station, Mumbai, present; no statute or precedent cited.
What did the court decide?
Since the applicant was arrested during the pendency of the present anticipatory bail application, as submitted by the learned Counsel for the applicant, nothing survives in the application and it stands disposed of as infructuous.