Yash Nitin Patil and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court anticipatory bail application rejected on the ground that the applicants' anticipatory bail application was still pending before the Sessions Court. Applicants: Yash Nitin Patil and another; Respondent: State of Maharashtra (APP P.H. Gaikwad); intervener appeared through Adv. Aniket Nikam; applicants represented by Adv. Harshad Sathe with Ms. Aishwarya Hinge. Case: Anticipatory Bail Application No. 120 of 2026; decided 14.01.2026 by Justice N.R. Borkar. Relevant to parallel/concurrent anticipatory bail applications before Sessions Court and High Court; no statute or precedent cited.
What did the court decide?
As the applicants' anticipatory bail application is still pending before the Sessions Court, the Court was not inclined to entertain the present application. ¶¶15