This execution application was dismissed for want of prosecution after remaining inactive for three years. Consequently, the ancillary interim applications and notice were also disposed of.
Execution application dismissed for want of prosecution; interim applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/2
10 - EXA 881 OF 2022.doc
Digitally signed KANCHANVINODMAYEKAR by KANCHANVINODMAYEKARDate:2026.04.22 10:18:17 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 881/2022
ALONGWITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1301/2020
ALONGWITH
NOTICE NO. 546/2025
IN
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 881/2022
TECHNOCRAFT INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD. ….. APPLICANT
VS
KSL AND INDUSTRIES LTD. ….. RESPONDENT
None for the Applicant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 21 APRIL, 2026
P.C. :-
Execution Application, hence, the Registry has placed this matter
today on board under the caption “For Dismissal under Rule 329 of
The Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules”.
out.
KVM
2/2
10 - EXA 881 OF 2022.doc
want of prosecution.
3.1) In sequel, the Interim Applications/Notice, if any, also stand disposed of.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the execution application shall be dismissed for want of prosecution due to inactivity for three years.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
TECHNOCRAFT INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD.
KSL AND INDUSTRIES LTD.
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
