Pratik S/O Nagindas Panchal v. Pallavi W/O Pratik Panchal
Case brief
What is this about?
Infructuous disposal order; neutral citation 2025:BHC-NAG:14281; Criminal Writ Petition 932 of 2025, Bombay HC Nagpur Bench, M.M. Nerlikar, J., dated 16.12.2025. Petitioner Pratik Nagindas Panchal (adv. A.S. Thotange) v. Respondents Pallavi Pratik Panchal and another (adv. V.N. Patre). Disposal rests solely on counsel's oral submission that nothing survives by efflux of time ('the same has become infructuous'); no statute or precedent cited, no impugned order identified. Of value only as a record that the matter became infructuous; carries no citable legal proposition.
What did the court decide?
The criminal writ petition is disposed of as infructuous on the submission of the petitioner's counsel that, by efflux of time, nothing survives in the matter; the Court recorded no adjudication on merits. ¶19