Shri Goraram Mandir Thr Vahivatdar,P.D.Agate and S.D. Agate v. Mahadeo Tukaram Pilake Decd. Thr Legal Heris
Case brief
What is this about?
Goraram Mandir (through Vahivatdar Prasad Dhondo Agate) v. legal heirs of Mahadeo Tukaram Pilake (deceased), incl. Dinesh Mahadeo Pilake; WP No.8491 of 2023; Article 227 Constitution of India; Exhibit-5 interim injunction application; Regular Civil Suit No.354 of 2020; Misc. Civil Appeal No.144 of 2021; 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Satara; District Judge-3, Satara; quashing of trial court and first appellate orders; Respondent No.1A consent/no objection; Respondent No.1B served but unrepresented; business-restriction limb of prayer not pressed; Exhibit-5 Application partly allowed; writ petition partly allowed; no order as to costs; decided 17 March 2025.
What did the court decide?
Both impugned orders (Order dated 24th March 2021 of the 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Satara below Exhibit-5 in Regular Civil Suit No.354 of 2020, and Judgment and Order dated 8th December 2022 of the District Judge-3, Satara in Misc. Civil Appeal No.144 of 2021) quashed and set aside; the Exhibit-5 Application partly allowed in the terms of the retained prayer clause recorded in the operative order (with no order as to costs).