Disposed¶15

Sindhu Education Society, Nagpur, Thr. Secretary, Mr. Deepak K. Bajaj and Others v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Education, Mumbai and Ors.

Bombay HC12 Dec 2025WP/7936/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ Petition No. 7936 of 2025; Sindhu Education Society; State of Maharashtra; revised staffing pattern; petitioner nos. 2 to 5; representation to respondent nos. 4 and 5; six weeks; judgment dated 07.10.2024 in Writ Petition No. 234 of 2024; Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench; Anil S. Kilor; Rajnish R. Vyas; disposed of; no costs; Rohan R. Deo; D. P. Thakre Additional Government Pleader.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of; respondent nos. 4 and 5 directed to treat the petition as a representation and decide the issues raised therein in the light of this Court's judgment dated 07.10.2024 in Writ Petition No. 234 of 2024, within six weeks of production of copy of the order; no order as to costs. ¶15

Sindhu Education Society, Nagpur, Thr. Secretary, Mr. Deepak K. Bajaj and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Education, Mumbai and Ors. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶15

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondents should be directed to provide revised staffing pattern in respect of petitioner nos. 2 to 5 in accordance with law and in the light of the directions issued by this Court in its judgment dated 07.10.2024 in Writ Petition No. 234 of 2024.

¶12

Ratio / Principle

Since the prayers made in the petition can always be considered by respondent nos. 4 and 5, the Court directed respondent nos. 4 and 5 to treat the present petition as a representation and decide the issues raised in the petition in the light of the judgment dated 07.10.2024 delivered in Writ Petition No. 234 of 2024, within a period of six weeks from the date of production of copy of the order.

¶13

Key takeaways

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertook to produce a copy of the petition along with the order passed that day before the concerned authority within one week.ratio¶14
With the observations and directions, the writ petition stood disposed of, with no order as to costs.ratio¶15

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Sindhu Education Society and others v. The State of Maharashtra and others — High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench (Anil S. Kilor and Rajnish R. Vyas, JJ.) — Writ Petition No. 7936 of 2025, decided 12.12.2025. The petition prayed for a direction to the respondents to provide a revised staffing pattern for petitioner nos. 2 to 5 in accordance with law and in the light of this Court's judgment dated 07.10.2024 in Writ Petition No. 234 of 2024. Holding that the prayers could always be considered by respondent nos. 4 and 5, the Court directed those respondents to treat the petition as a representation and decide the issues raised in it in the light of the said judgment dated 07.10.2024, within six weeks of production of a copy of the order; counsel for the petitioners undertook to furnish the petition and the order to the concerned authority within one week. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

Sindhu Education Society, Nagpur, Thr. Secretary, Mr. Deepak K. Bajaj and Others v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Education, Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sindhu Education Society, Nagpur, Thr. Secretary, Mr. Deepak K. Bajaj and Others v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Education, Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dilip Vishwanath Khune and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Irrigation, Mumbai and Others

Sarika D/O Gajanan Kolhe Vs State of Maha., Thr. Prin. Secretary, Medical Education and Drugs Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Akhil Maha Cycle Polo Association Nagpur, Thr. Secretary, Gajanan S/O Gomaji Burde Vs Union of India, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Youth Affair and Sports, New Delhi and Ors.

Vinodsingh S/O Suratsingh Chandel and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra, Revenue and Forest Dept., Thr. Collector, Nagpur and Others

Abhay S/O Gopalrao Kolarkar and Others Vs Union of India through Secretary,Ministry of Labour and Dept. of Employment, and Others

Dr. Ashok S/O Pandurangji Arbat and Others Vs Shri Shivaji Shikshan Sanstha, Amravati Thr. Secretary, Vijay Govindrao Thakare and Another