Dismissed¶¶12

Anangpalsingh Devicharansingh Pawar v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Revenue and Forest, Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC22 Jan 2025WP/7711/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

K-Prat confirmation; measurement objections pending; Rule 16(2), Maharashtra Land Revenue (Revenue Surveys and SubDivisions of Survey Number) Rules, 1969; Survey Nos.1101/1 to 1101/7; Proceedings No.171/2021; writ petition dismissed with time-bound direction to respondent No.2 (on or before 30-3-2025); High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench; coram Avinash G. Gharote & Abhay J. Mantri, JJ.; decided 22-01-2025.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; respondent No.2 directed to decide the pending measurement-objection proceedings (No.171/2021) as early as possible, and in any case on or before 30-3-2025. ¶¶12

Anangpalsingh Devicharansingh Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Revenue and Forest, Mumbai and Others — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 wp7711.22

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 7711 OF 2022

¶4

( Anangpalsingh Devicharansingh Pawar ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Mumbai and others )

¶5

- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

- - - - Mr. P.R. Puri, Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. J.Y. Ghurde, A.G.P. for the respondents/State.

¶7

CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : 22-01-2025

¶8

Heard Mr. P.R. Puri, learned Counsel for the

¶9

petitioner. The petitioner claims relief of a direction to the respondent No.2 to confirm the K-Prat of the measured land of Survey Nos.1101/1 to 1101/7.

¶10

It is not disputed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that objections to the measurement has been raised by the respondent Nos.3 and 4, which are pending before the respondent No.2 in proceedings bearing No.171/2021 (Page No.43). It is, therefore, apparent that in terms of Rule 16(2) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue (Revenue Surveys and SubDivisions of Survey Number) Rules, 1969 any final K-Prat can only be issued, after the dispute is finally decided one way or

¶11

2 wp7711.22

¶12

the other. In that view of the matter, the relief claimed in petition cannot be granted. The petition is therefore, dismissed, however, the respondent No.2 is directed to decide the proceedings pending before him, as early as possible, and in any case, on or before 30-3-2025.

¶13

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)

¶14

adgokar

Anangpalsingh Devicharansingh Pawar v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Revenue and Forest, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anangpalsingh Devicharansingh Pawar v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Revenue and Forest, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandrashekhar Kisanlal Jaiswal Vs the Yavatmal Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd., Yavatmal Thr. Authorized Officer and Others

Shekhar S/O Purushottam Kannao and Another vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Urban Development Dept., Mumbai and Another

Siddhant Krantivir Tayade vs Union of India, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi and Ors.

Dr. Rajaram B. Athavale Vs the Vidarbha Medical Education and Research Foundation, Akola Thr.President A.J. Goenka and Another

Ku. Usha D/O Narayan Rajuke @ Smt. Usha W/O R. Shivaruke Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Secretary, Ministry of Nomadic Tribes, Mantralaya Mumbai and Others

M/S Nikhil Telecom, Thr. Its Prop. Nikhil Shankarlal Dhoot vs the Principle Chief Commissioner, Cgst and Cx, Nagpur Zone, Nagpur and Ors.