Disposed¶15

Gita Tukaram Kale v. State of Mah. Thr. Addl. Commisioner of Police Crime Branch Nagpur City Tah. Nagpur and Others.

Bombay HC1 Oct 2025WP/769/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Gita Tukaram Kale v. State of Maharashtra, Criminal Writ Petition No. 769 of 2023, Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench, decided 01-10-2025 (2025:BHC-NAG:10045-DB); custody of minor daughter with respondent no. 3; petitioner's grievance of non-decision of her 13-9-2023 custody application; application decided on 25-10-2023 (Annexure - 5); prayer without substantive relief cannot be granted; liberty to avail legal remedy against the custody order; petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the petitioner to avail the remedy available in law against the order dated 25-10-2023 deciding her custody application; petition disposed of accordingly. ¶15

Gita Tukaram Kale Vs State of Mah. Thr. Addl. Commisioner of Police Crime Branch Nagpur City Tah. Nagpur and Others. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2025:BHC-NAG:10045-DB

¶2

1 cr. wp 769.2023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶4

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 769 OF 2023

¶5

[Gita Tukaram Kale vs. The State of Maharashtra, through the Additional Commissioner of Police, Crime Branch, Nagpur City and ors.]

¶6

- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶7

- - - - ------------------ - - - Mr. R. L. Kadu, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. I. J. Damle, APP for the State/respondent nos. 1 to 3

¶8

CORAM: ANIL L. PANSARE AND SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, JJ.

¶9

DATED : 01-10-2025.

¶10

Heard.

¶11

The petitioner seeks direction to the respondents to hand over custody of minor daughter to the petitioner. The custody as of now is with respondent no. 3 and, therefore, the counsel for petitioner submits that prayer should be read accordingly. Such a prayer without there being any substantive relief upon which such prayer is made cannot be granted.

¶12

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner has invited our attention to Annexure – C, which is application dated 13-9-2023 made by the petitioner before the respondent no. 3 seeking custody of the child. The grievance of the petitioner is that her application has been not decided.

¶13

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has tendered reply and submits that the application has been decided on 25-10-2023. Copy of order is annexed with the reply as Annexure – 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to avail remedy as is available in law against said order. Liberty is granted.

¶14

2 cr. wp 769.2023

¶15

The petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶16

(S. S. THOMBRE, J.) (A. L. PANSARE, J.)

¶17

wasnik

Gita Tukaram Kale v. State of Mah. Thr. Addl. Commisioner of Police Crime Branch Nagpur City Tah. Nagpur and Others.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gita Tukaram Kale v. State of Mah. Thr. Addl. Commisioner of Police Crime Branch Nagpur City Tah. Nagpur and Others.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satish S/O Dattatraya Akre Vs Vidarbha Konkan Gramin Bank, through Its General Manager, Nagpur and Another

Abu Rehbar Hasan Khan Vs State of Mah. Thr. Its Secretary, Dept. of Home Affairs, Mantralaya, Mumbai and 2 Others

Ganesh S/O Motiramji Wakode Vs Vidarbha Konkan Gramin Bank through Its General Manager, Nagpur and Another

Sanjay S/O Mahalmal Duhilani and 2 Others Vs State of Orissa Thr. Its Investigating Officer Ps Bandamunda and 2 Others

Vilas Shamrao Goyar Vs Dy Director General of Police Prison and Reformation Mah. State PUNE-1 and 1

Kunal S/O Sanjay Duhilani Vs State of Orissa, Thr. Its Investigating Officer P.S. Bandamunda, Dist. Rourkela Odisha 770032 and 2