Disposed¶10

Janabai Balak Ashram Throu. Its President Throu. Gurudev Shikshan Prasarak Mandal v. the State of Maharashtra Throu. Its Principal Sec. Women and Child Development Dept and Anr.

Bombay HC22 Jan 2025WP/6970/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court common 'paucity of time' adjournment order dated 22.01.2025; coram A.S. Chandurkar and M.M. Sathaye JJ; Daily and Supplementary Board matters (Appellate Side and Original Side) adjourned to CIS dates 05.02.2025, 03.03.2025 and 04.03.2025; ad-interim/interim relief operative on order date continued till respective next dates; no case number, parties, statutory provisions or case law involved; not a substantive judgment suitable for citation on legal propositions.

What did the court decide?

Adjournment of listed matters to CIS-fixed dates (05.02.2025, 03.03.2025, 04.03.2025) with continuation of ad-interim/interim relief operative on 22.01.2025 until the respective next dates. ¶10

Janabai Balak Ashram Throu. Its President Throu. Gurudev Shikshan Prasarak Mandal vs the State of Maharashtra Throu. Its Principal Sec. Women and Child Development Dept and Anr. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1/1

¶2

paucity order.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION AND

¶4

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER

¶5

CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & M.M.SATHAYE, JJ

¶6

SNEHA NITIN CHAVAN

¶7

Digitally signed by SNEHA NITIN CHAVAN Date: 2025.01.24 11:50:38 +0530

¶8

P.C. :-

¶9

DATE : 22^nd JANUARY, 2025

¶10

On account of paucity of time, rest of the matters on Daily and Supplementary Board stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per the CIS.

¶11

Sr. Nos.	C.I.S. DATE
37 (Appellate Side),	05.02.2025
54, 55 (Original Side)
30, 32, 33, 39, 40 (Appellate Side)	03.03.2025
29, 31, 35, 41 (Original Side)
43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 50, 51, 62, 64	04.03.2025
(Appellate Side)
56, 57, 58, 65 (Original Side)

¶12

If in any of the above matters, ad-interim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If ad-interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected.

¶13

[ M.M.SATHAYE, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ]

¶14

Sneha Chavan

Janabai Balak Ashram Throu. Its President Throu. Gurudev Shikshan Prasarak Mandal v. the State of Maharashtra Throu. Its Principal Sec. Women and Child Development Dept and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Janabai Balak Ashram Throu. Its President Throu. Gurudev Shikshan Prasarak Mandal v. the State of Maharashtra Throu. Its Principal Sec. Women and Child Development Dept and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ramadas Ks vs Tata Institute of Social Sciences

Haq Steels and Mataliks Limited through Its Authorised Signatory vs Adi Impex Infra Services

Sanjeevani Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Anr. vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Kamaladevi Education Trust Throu. Its Chairman Sadanand Tirthraj Tiwari vs the State of Maharashtra Throu. Its Principal Sec. Higher and Technical Education and Ors.

Dimple Construction vs State of Maharahstra Thr Its Revenue Minister and Ors.

Vardhaman Education and Medical Association at Umadi Tal Jath Dist. Sangli Thr Chairman and Anr. vs the State of Maharashtra, Skills, Employment , Entrepreneurship and Innovation Dept. and Ors.