Writ petition against the State of Maharashtra and others was disposed of as infructuous, with liberty to the petitioners to apply afresh if they demonstrate that the cause still survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
61-5813-2023-CWP=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5813 OF 2023
Digitally signed by UDAY UDAYSHIVAJI SHIVAJI JAGTAP JAGTAP Date:2025.12.16 20:34:00 +0530
Vaibhav Nilkanth Savardekar & Ors. … Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
None for the Petitioners.
Mr. Rugwed R. Kinkar and Rajvardhan Chougule i/b Dr. Dheeraj Patil for the respondent No.4 Mrs. S.N. Deshmukh, AGP for the Respondent - State.
Coram : M. S. Karnik & Ajit B. Kadethankar, JJ. Date : December 15, 2025.
P. C. :
1. Having gone through the relief prayed for in the petition, we are
2. Liberty to apply in case the petitioners demonstrate if the cause
still survives.
3. The Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
[Ajit B. Kadethankar, J. ] [ M. S. Karnik ]
1 of 1
Uday S. Jagtap
Vaibhav Nilkanth Savardekar & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
M. S. Karnik
Ajit B. Kadethankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
