Jainuddin Alias Jainu Mohammad Rauf Ansari v. State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench; Criminal Writ Petition No. 223/2025 (Akshay Bhaskar Sahare v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.) with 29 connected writ petitions (Nos. 227-734 of 2025); corrigendum/correction order dated October 6, 2025; corrects paragraphs 85 and 86 of judgment dated 30.09.2025; “Section 2(c)” replaced by “Section 2(a)”; “appeal” replaced by “approval”; sentence “and are liable to be quashed and set aside” deleted; Senior Counsel/Government Pleader D.V. Chauhan for the State; counsel M.N. Ali for petitioner.
What did the court decide?
Corrigendum directions issued: in paragraph 85 of the judgment dated 30.09.2025, “Section 2(c)” is replaced by “Section 2(a)”; in paragraph 86, “appeal” is replaced by “approval”; the sentence “and are liable to be quashed and set aside” in paragraph 86 stands deleted; corrections to be made immediately and the corrected copy uploaded forthwith.