Disposed¶13
Bharat S/O Inderchand Kejadiwal v. Sharad S/O Mahadeo Mahajan, Thr. Constituted Attorney Namely, Ketan S/O Sharad Mahajan
Bombay HCWP/521/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Consensual disposal of cross writ petitions before Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench; joint pursis compromise (Stamp No. 3/2025) with ten terms; tenant appeared in person and consented; consent terms marked 'X'; parties Sharad S/o Mahadeo Mahajan and Bharat S/o Inderchand Kejadiwal; advocates A.S. Manohar and Sanket Bhalerao; decided 07.03.2025 by Smt. M.S. Jawalkar, J.; no costs.
What did the court decide?
Both writ petitions disposed of in terms of the compromise recorded in the joint pursis (ten consent terms); consent terms taken on record and marked 'X'; no orders as to costs. ¶13