Anant Gangaram Pilankar v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Delay in pronouncement of judgment; direction to deliver judgment; Appeal No.26 of 2025 closed for orders since 23 April 2025; time-bound disposal preferred before 30 August 2025; Bombay High Court writ jurisdiction (criminal appellate side); petitioner Anant Gangaram Pilankar; Respondent No.1 State of Maharashtra; Respondent No.2 directed to render judgment; advocates Priyank Daga and APP Mayur Sonavane.
What did the court decide?
Direction to Respondent No.2 to deliver/pronounce the judgment in Appeal No.26 of 2025 as expeditiously as possible, preferably before 30 August 2025. ¶¶11