Disposed¶14

Priyanka Yogesh Dixit v. Yogesh Prakash Dixit

Bombay HC4 Aug 2025WP/3761/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition stands disposed of with directions to the learned Adhoc District Judge-3, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar to decide the pending appeal on its own merits, within a period of two (2) months from the date of the judgment; parties were further directed to co-operate. ¶14

Priyanka Yogesh Dixit Vs Yogesh Prakash Dixit — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶14

Issue for consideration

Whether the interim order dated 13.12.2024 passed by the Adhoc District Judge-3, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar below Exhibit-4 in PWDVA No. 69 of 2024, granting ad-interim stay to the maintenance order of the Judicial Magistrate First Class in favour of the petitioner, was open to interference by this Court in writ jurisdiction.

¶10

Court's answer

Without delving into the merit of the challenge to the impugned order, the Court held it appropriate to direct the learned Adhoc District Judge, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar to decide the pending appeal expeditiously.

¶14

Ratio / Principle

The Writ Petition stands disposed of with directions to the learned Adhoc District Judge-3, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar to decide the pending appeal on its own merits, within a period of two (2) months from the date of the judgment.

¶14

Key takeaways

The parties were directed to co-operate in the expeditious disposal of the pending appeal.¶16

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bombay High Court (Bench at Aurangabad), S. G. Chapalgaonkar, J. (per court): Disposed of Writ Petition No. 3761 of 2025 filed by Priyanka Yogesh Dixit against Yogesh Prakash Dixit challenging the order dated 13.12.2024 of the Adhoc District Judge-3, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar below Exhibit-4 in PWDVA No. 69 of 2024, whereby ad-interim stay had been granted to the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class granting maintenance in favour of the petitioner. As the underlying appeal was already at the stage of final hearing before the learned District Judge, the Court, without delving into the merit of the challenge, directed the Adhoc District Judge-3 to decide the pending appeal on its own merits within two (2) months, and directed the parties to co-operate. No finding was recorded on the sustainability of the interim stay order.

Priyanka Yogesh Dixit v. Yogesh Prakash Dixit

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Priyanka Yogesh Dixit v. Yogesh Prakash Dixit

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Diliprao Mohanrao Jadhav Vs Mohanrao Manikrao Patil

Ushabai Santosh Wagh Vs the Collector Dhule and Others

Raghunath Bhagwatrao Devrat Died Thr Lrs Aruna and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Dhanashree Pankajkumar Choudhari Vs the District Collector Dhule and Others

Ravindra Dattartay Kunjar Vs Yashodabai Raibhan Navpute and Others

Vijay Vasantrao Ekbote Vs Prakash Vasantrao Ekbote and Another