Dr. Abhay Kashinath Patil Vs State of Maha., Thr. Secy., Urban Development Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

¶1

2025:BHC-NAG:13136-DB

¶2

wp348.2025.odt

¶3

1

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 348 OF 2025

¶6

PETITIONER: Dr. Abhay Kashinath Patil, Age 58 years, Occupation : Medical Profession, R/o C/o Dr. K. S. Patil Hospital, Behind LIC Office, Shrawagi Plot, Akola, District Akola.

¶7

...V E R S U S…

¶8

RESPONDENTS 1. The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.

¶9

The Municipal Corporation Akola through its Commissioner at Akola O/c Municipal Corporation Akola, Ta. Akola District Akola.

¶10

The Collector, Akola, through its Special Land Acquisition Officer, Akola, Collector Office, Akola 444001.

¶11

Mr. G.K. Mundhada, counsel for petitioner. Mr. N.R. Patil, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 3. Mr. J.B. Kasat, counsel for respondent No.2.

¶12

CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND RAJNISH R. VYAS, JJ. DATE : 26/11/2025

¶13

JUDGMENT : (Per Rajnish R. Vyas, J)

¶14

Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By

RKN

wp348.2025.odt

2

consent of the parties, petition is taken up for final hearing at the stage of admission.

¶19

By way of present petition, the following prayer is made; to declare that the reservation for Site No. 94 (reserved for purpose of Government Administrative Purpose) vide Resolution No. 94, affecting the land of Survey No.12/1 of village Kaulkhed, Tq. Akola, Dist. Akola, area admeasuring 0.50 HR and owned by the petitioner, in the 1^st Revised Final Development Plan of Akola city, 2024, has lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (for short “the Act of 1966”). The prayer is also made to declare that petitioner is free to develop the land in the manner permissible to adjacent land as per the development plant.

¶20

It is the submission of the petitioner that on 01/01/1992, first development plan of the City of Akola was sanctioned by the State Government, which came into force on 01/03/1993, wherein the land stated above was reserved for purpose of Government Administration vide Reservation No. 94. According to him, since no steps of acquisition were taken by the respondent/authorities in spite of lapse of ten years, a notice

¶21

RKN

¶22

3 wp348.2025.odt

¶23

under Section 127 of the Act of 1966 was issued to the respondents on 26/02/2022 along with 7/12 extract, part plan map of development plan, measurement sheet, and Vakalatnama (Page-23). He then contended that, in spite of this notice, the respondents had taken no action.

¶24

4. Respondent No.2 – Municipal Corporation, Akola, filed

¶25

its reply dated 14/07/2025, contending that since appropriate authorities for acquisition were respondent Nos. 1 and 3 i.e. the State of Maharashtra, by communication dated 19/04/2022, the Commissioner of Municipal Corporation, Akola, communicated respondent No.3 – Collector, Akola for taking necessary steps of acquisition of the land in view of the purchase notice.

¶26

Respondent No.3, in its reply dated 13/08/2025, contended that it has not received any demand from any authority related to the development plan seeking acquisition as per Development Plan.

¶27

In the aforesaid background, it is clear that though a purchase notice was issued on 26/02/2022 along with relevant documents, and was duly received, nothing has been done by the respondent authorities. No steps were taken to acquire the

RKN

wp348.2025.odt

4

reserved land under development plan by the respondents and therefore, the statutory right of the petitioner cannot be taken away. Merely because the second revised draft development plan was pending, the petitioner cannot be held dis-entitled from claiming the relief.

¶32

That being so, we allow the present petition on following terms.

¶33

ORDER

¶34

A] The writ petition is allowed.

¶35

B] It is declared that reservation for Site No. 94 (Government Administrative Purpose), affecting the land of Gat/Survey No.12/1 of village Kaulkhed, Tq. Akola, District Akola, area admeasuring 0.50 HR and owned by the petitioner, in the 1^st Revised Final Development Plan of Akola City, 2004, has lapsed under Section 127 of the Act of 1966. The petitioner is, therefore, free to develop the land owned by him in the manner permissible to adjacent land as per the development plan.

¶36

C] The respondent No.1 is directed to notify and publish the same in Official Gazette within a period of eight weeks from the receipt of this order.

RKN

wp348.2025.odt

5

Rule is made absolute in above terms. No order as to

¶41

costs. Pending Application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.

¶42

(RAJNISH R. VYAS, J.)

¶43

(ANIL S. KILOR, J.)

¶44

RKN

Dr. Abhay Kashinath Patil v. State of Maha., Thr. Secy., Urban Development Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Abhay Kashinath Patil v. State of Maha., Thr. Secy., Urban Development Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhagyashri Vikas Jaybhaye Vs the State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Public Health Officer, Mumbai and Ors.

Mahmad Zuber Usman Gani Memon and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Public Health Officer, Mumbai and Ors.

The State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary, Higher and Technical Education, Mumbai and Ors. Vs Rahimullah S. Shaikh

Raspelli Bhagya Kistaiya Vs General Manager, Western Coalfields Ltd., Majri Area, Chandrapur and Ors.

Jaya Diliprao Bhoyar and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Revenue, Registration and Stamp, Mumbai and Ors.

Prakash Yadav Tale and Others Vs State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Public Health, Mumbai and Ors.