Sangita Dnyandeo Rasal v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Service law – Shikshan Sevak
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench; WRIT PETITION NO. 3322 OF 2020 (neutral citation 2025:BHC-AUG:8520-DB); Sangita D/o. Dnyandeo Rasal v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.; part-time Shikshan Sevak seeking full-time Teacher appointment per Government Resolution/Government policy; six years part-time service; representation ignored; petitioner's counsel absent; disposed of with staged directions (proposal to Management within 4 weeks, forwarding to Deputy Director of Education within further 4 weeks, State decision within 3 months); no statute or precedent cited; order per Arun R. Pedneker, J. with Alok Aradhe, C.J.; decided 21 March 2025.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition disposed of with directions: Petitioner to submit proposal for full-time appointment to the Management (Respondent No.3) within 4 weeks; Management to forward it to Respondent No.2 within a further 4 weeks; State Authority to decide the proposal within 3 months thereafter.