Dismissed¶¶16

Meena Wd/O. Pravin Maloo and Another v. Tahsildar, Amravati and Others

Bombay HC19 Aug 2025WP/3256/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench; Writ Petition No.3256 of 2025; decided 19.08.2025 by Prafulla S. Khubalkar, J.; maintainability of writ petition; alternate remedy; Article 227 of the Constitution of India; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code; Tahsildar, Amravati; order dated 06.05.2025 in Proceedings No.RTS-85/Reosa11/2024-25; consequential mutation in 7/12 extract; suppression of material facts; pendency of civil suit; denial of opportunity of hearing; dismissal with liberty to approach appellate authority; all issues kept open.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed on account of alternate remedy; petitioners at liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings (before the appellate authority); all issues kept open. ¶¶16

Meena Wd/O. Pravin Maloo and Another Vs Tahsildar… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2025)

¶1

wp3256.25.O.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.3256 OF 2025

¶5

(Meena wd/o Pravin Maloo and another Vs. Tahsildar, Amravati and others)

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar’s Orders.

¶7

Mr. Kshitij Jain, Advocate for Petitioners.

¶8

Ms. Kavita H. Bhondge, AGP for Respondent No.1/State. Mr. J. J. Chandurkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 to 11.

¶9

CORAM: PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J. DATE: 19th AUGUST, 2025.

¶10

Heard Advocate Mr. Kshitij Jain, learned counsel for petitioners.

¶11

By this petition, the petitioners have challenged order dated 06.05.2025 passed by the respondent No.1 – Tahsildar, Amravati in proceedings No.RTS-85/Reosa11/2024-25 and the consequential mutation in the 7/12 extract. The petitioners have raised several grounds challenging the impugned order alleging suppression of material facts by the respondent and pendency of the civil suit in between the parties and it is submitted that the impugned order is passed without affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.

¶12

The respondents have raised challenge to the maintainability of the petition on the ground of alternate remedy by pointing out that the challenge to the order passed by the respondent No.1 Tahsildar can be raised by

¶13

wp3256.25.O.odt

¶14

¶15

way of appropriate proceedings under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

¶16

Although the counsel for petitioners have raised several contentions challenging the legality of the impugned order the same can be raised and agitated before the appellate authority. As such in view of alternate remedy no indulgence is warranted under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petition is therefore, dismissed on account of alternate remedy. The petitioners are at liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings. All issues are kept open. Writ petition is disposed of.

¶17

(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)

¶18

NSN

Meena Wd/O. Pravin Maloo and Another v. Tahsildar, Amravati and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Meena Wd/O. Pravin Maloo and Another v. Tahsildar, Amravati and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sureshkumar Chobdar S/O Mahavirprasad Chobdar Vs State of Maha.,Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Cooperation, Textile and Marketing Dept., Mumbai and Anr.

Smt. Sulochana Wd/O Ramkrishna Shende and Others Vs Madhukar S/O Atmaram Bhandarkar and Another

Khemchand Bherumal Bajaj Dharamshala and Hospital Trust, Thr. Managing Trustee, Dr. G. K. Bajaj vs Municipal Corporation, Amravati, Thr. Its Commissioner and Others

Sagar Kishor Admane vs Smt. Mamta W/O. Siddharth Bodale and Others

Sunil S/O Ganeshrao Mehare and Another Vs Ansar Khan S/O Hasan Khan and Others

Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, Amravati, Thr. Registrar, Amravati vs Ravindra J. Sayam