Paramhans Ramsumarbaba Co-Op. Housing So., Ngapur Thr. Secy., Akshay a. Tidke v. State of Maha., Thr. Secy., Urban Development, Mumbai and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench; Neutral citation 2025:BHC-NAG:7966-DB; WRIT PETITION NO.2921 OF 2025; decided 13.08.2025 by Anil S. Kilor and Vrushali V. Joshi, JJ. Petitioner: Paramhans Ramsumarbaba Co-op. Housing Society, Nagpur, through Secretary Akshay A. Tidke; Respondents: State of Maharashtra (through Secretary, Urban Development), Mumbai and others. Counsel: H.R. Gadhia for petitioner; A.M. Kadukar, AGP, for State; D.A. Mohagaonkar for respondent No.2; P.S. Tiwari for respondent No.4. Outcome: petition disposed of as not surviving because the respondent-authority/NIT fixed the matter for hearing. No statutes or precedents discussed; no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
Since the respondent-authority/NIT has fixed the matter for hearing on the prayer made in the petition, the writ petition does not survive and is disposed of.