Disposed¶13

Sanjay Sukhlal Mogre and Another v. State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Urban Development Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Bombay HC11 Feb 2025WP/2668/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

gratuity; leave encashment; Municipal Council Mul; employees' retirement dues; deduction of amounts already paid; payment within four months; undisputed entitlement; writ petitions disposed; Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench; State of Maharashtra Urban Development Department; Shama Kuksu Gedam; Sanjay Sukhlal Mogre; Ayubkhan Pathan.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.3 (Municipal Council, Mul) to calculate the gratuity and leave encashment payable to the petitioners after deducting the amounts already paid on those counts, and to make payment within four months. ¶13

Sanjay Sukhlal Mogre and Another vs State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Urban Development Dept., Mumbai and Ors. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

23-wp2142.24.odt 1/2

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .

¶3

WRIT PETITION No.2142 OF 2024

¶4

(Shama Kuksu Gedam and others Vs. State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mumbai and others)

¶5

WRIT PETITION No.2668 OF 2024

¶6

(Sanjay Sukhlal Mogre and another Vs. State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mumbai and others)

¶7

WRIT PETITION No.867 OF 2024

¶8

(Ayubkhan s/o. Dildarkhan Pathan and others Vs. State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mumbai and others)

¶9

Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram,__________________________________________________________________________ appearances, Court's orders of direction, Court's or Judge's orders. And Registrar's Orders.

¶10

Mr. R.R. Dawda, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. N.R. Patil, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. D.M. Kale, Advocate for respondent No.3.

¶11

Coram : Avinash G. Gharote and Abhay J. Mantri, JJ. Date : 11th February , 2025.

¶12

Mr. D.M. Kale, learned counsel for respondent No.3/Municipal Council, Mul does not dispute the entitlement of all the petitioners in these petitions for gratuity and leave encashment. He, however, submits that certain amounts have been paid to the petitioners, which shall be taken into consideration and accounted for while calculating the final amount to be paid to these petitioners on the above count. He also seeks six months’ time for making such payment on account of there being other similarly situated employees, who will also have to be taken into consideration.

¶13

In view of the above undisputed position, we dispose of all these petitions, by directing the respondent No.3 to calculate the amount of gratuity and leave encashment payable to the petitioners, by deducting the amounts already paid to them

¶14

23-wp2142.24.odt 2/2

¶15

on these counts and make payment to the petitioners within a period of four months from today.

¶16

(Abhay J. Mantri, J.) (Avinash G. Gharote, J.)

¶17

Wadode

¶18

Signed by: Mr. Devendra Wadode Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 12/02/2025 14:36:24

Sanjay Sukhlal Mogre and Another v. State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Urban Development Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Sukhlal Mogre and Another v. State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Urban Development Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Swati Atishsingh Khagar Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Secretary, Dept. of Education, Mumbai and Others

Gaurav S/O Sunil Mutha Vs the Nagpur Improvement Trust, through Its Chairman and Others

Masumiya Urdu Education Society, Thr. Its President, Buldhana and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Sec. Education and Sport Dept., Mantralaya, Mumbai and Ors.

Shailesh S/O Hanmantrao Kople Vs Scheduled Tirbe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, through Its Chairman,Nagpur and Others

Jai Jawan Aaji Maji Sainik Gruhnirman Sahkari Sanstha Thr President Shri Mahadeo Y Manwar Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Secretary and Ors.

Sunil S/O Tulshiram Bhujade Vs M/S Western Coalfield Ltd, Thr. Its General Manager, Nagpur and Another