The General Manager. Axis Bank, Mumbai Thr. Shri. Dinesh Mrotrao Nawalkar and Another v. Sharad Govindrao Bansinge and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Short single-judge order (R. M. Joshi, J., Bombay HC Nagpur Bench, 09-06-2025) disposing of Writ Petition No. 227 of 2024 (Axis Bank General Manager v. Sharad Govindrao Bansinge & Ors.) as infructuous, because Respondent No.1 had already obtained the benefits of the impugned order from Respondent No.3 and petitioners did not dispute this. Matter ended as academic; no substantive adjudication, no statutory provisions, no precedents cited, and no quantum involved. Limited citation value except as an example of disposal for infructuousity.
What did the court decide?
Since Respondent No.1 has received the benefits arising out of the impugned order from Respondent No.3 (a fact not disputed by the petitioners' counsel) and nothing survives in the Petition, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. ¶¶10