Disposed¶24

Sanjay S/O Gulabchand Gupta v. Superintendent Engineer, National Highway Division, Public Works Dept., Nagpur and Anr.

Bombay HC5 May 2025WP/2081/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench; Sanjay s/o Gulabchand Gupta v. Superintending Engineer, National Highway Division, PWD Nagpur; Writ Petition No.2081/2025; decided 05-05-2025 by Nitin W. Sambre & Vrushali V. Joshi, JJ.; disposal of writ petition on undertaking of P.W.D. to remove extra construction on petitioner's plot and restore the area within four weeks; compliance report within eight weeks; State of Maharashtra added as respondent No.3; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Undertaking accepted: the respondent P.W.D. to remove the extra construction carried out on the petitioner's plot along with other wings of State P.W.D., and restore the area, within four weeks; compliance report to be filed within eight weeks; no costs. ¶24

Sanjay S/O Gulabchand Gupta Vs Superintendent Engineer, National Highway Division, Public Works Dept., Nagpur and Anr. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 wp2081.25.odt

¶2

2025:BHC-NAG:4779-DB

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.2081/2025

¶5

Sanjay s/o Gulabchand Gupta Vs. Superintending Engineer, National Highway Division, Public Works Department, Nagpur and another

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,

¶7

appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.

¶8

Mr. A.P.Kalmegh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S.Rao, A.G.P. for the respondents/Sate.

¶9

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE & MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : MAY 5, 2025.

¶10

Heard.

¶11

Leave to add the State of Maharashtra through its Additional Chief

¶12

Secretary, Department of Public Works, Mantralaya, Mumbai as party-respondent No.3 is granted.

¶13

Issue notice to the respondent no.3.

¶14

Mr. N.S. Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of

¶15

notice on behalf of the newly added respondent No.3-State of Maharashtra.

¶16

Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

¶17

Place the matter at 2.30 p.m. on 5^th May, 2025.

¶18

(MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W.SAMBRE, J.)

¶19

Later on

¶20

The Superintending Engineer is physically present in the Court, who has

¶21

sworn an affidavit. He states that the entire grievance of the petitioner can be redressed by removing the extra construction carried out by said respondent and other wings of State P.W.D. on the plot which is owned by the petitioner. It is stated that the same shall be removed within a period of four weeks from

¶22

2 wp2081.25.odt

¶23

today. It is also assured that not only removal of construction by the respondent P.W.D. will be carried out but the restoration of area shall also be done. Since the Superintending Engineer is physically present in the Court and has made above categorical statement through learned A.G.P. same is accepted as an undertaking to this Court.

¶24

The petition is accordingly disposed of based on the aforesaid statement. No costs.

¶25

Compliance report be placed on record within a period of eight weeks from today.

¶26

(MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶27

Mukund Ambulkar/Tambaskar.

Sanjay S/O Gulabchand Gupta v. Superintendent Engineer, National Highway Division, Public Works Dept., Nagpur and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay S/O Gulabchand Gupta v. Superintendent Engineer, National Highway Division, Public Works Dept., Nagpur and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kailasrao Wadguji Arade vs the Sub Divisional Officer, Ralegaon, Yavatmal and Others

M/S Madhusudan Agrawal Project Private Ltd., Bilaspur, Thr. Managing Director, Dakshesh M. Agrawal vs Rites Limited, through Its General Manager, Nagpur and Another

Manish S/O. Babanrao Porate and Others vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Mumbai and Ors.

Dilipsingh Sardarsingh Bagga and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mumbai and Another

Archana D/O Shyamrao Dandekar vs the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Amravati and Others

Berozgaranchi Kshitiz Nagrik Seva Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit, Amravati Thr. Pre., Sagar v. Pangre vs Akola Municipal Corporation Akola Thr. Commissioner and Anr.