Babruwan Anna Raut and Others v. Nagnath Ramling Raut

Bombay HC17 Nov 2025WP/1744/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Article 227 writ — temporary injunction — Regular Civil Suit No.292/2020, Civil Judge Jr. Division, Tuljapur — Misc. Civil Appeal No.35/2021, District Judge-1, Osmanabad, dismissed — writ petition not pressed — direction to Trial Court for expeditious disposal of suit — Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench — Neeraj P. Dhote, J.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition disposed of as not pressed; Trial Court directed to expedite Regular Civil Suit No.292/2020 and endeavour to dispose of it within a reasonable period. ¶¶16

Babruwan Anna Raut and Others Vs Nagnath Ramling Raut — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2025)

¶1

2025:BHC-AUG:31568

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

¶4

2 WRIT PETITION NO.1744 OF 2022

¶5

Babruwan Anna Raut And Others … Petitioners Versus

¶6

Nagnath Ramling Raut … Respondent

¶7

Shri. Aditya V. Kasane h/f. Shri. V.D. Salunke, Advocate for the Petitioners

¶8

Shri. M. B. Sandanshiv, Advocate for the Respondent

¶9

CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. Dated : NOVEMBER 17, 2025

¶10

PER COURT :-

¶11

. The learned Advocate Shri. Aditya V. Kasane h/f. the learned Advocate Shri. V.D. Salunke for the Petitioners submits that, the Petition can be disposed off with a direction to the learned Trial Court to dispose of the civil suit within a stipulated time.

¶12

The learned Advocate for the sole Respondent submits that, since there was no stay operating in this Petition, the civil suit has proceed and the evidence is going on.

¶13

The Petitioners are the Orig. Defendants in Regular Civil Suit No.292/2020 before the learned Civil Judge Jr. Division, Tuljapur. The learned Trial Court allowed the Application below Exh.5 for injunction preferred by the sole Respondent, who was the Orig. Plaintiff. Against the grant of temporary injunction, the Petitioners moved before the District Judge-1, Osmanabad in Misc. Civil Appeal No.35/2021 which also came to be dismissed. Thereafter, the Petitioners approached this Court in this Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

¶14

¶15

Admittedly, there is no interim order in this Petition. Consequently, the suit has proceed and the evidence is going on. Thus, the learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits that, the Petition be disposed off as not pressed.

¶16

The Writ Petition stands disposed off as not pressed.

¶17

The learned Trial Court to expedite the civil suit and endeavour to dispose off the said suit within reasonable period.

¶18

( NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. )

¶19

GGP

¶20

Signed by: Gajanan G. Punde Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 18/11/2025 17:28:25

Babruwan Anna Raut and Others v. Nagnath Ramling Raut

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Babruwan Anna Raut and Others v. Nagnath Ramling Raut

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chintu S/O Maheshprasad Soni vs State of Maharashtra Thru Pso, Ps Ramnagar

Hiren Mukunchandra Nagar vs State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station Officer Ps Valiv Dist Mira Bhainder Vasai Virar

Abdul Karim Kasam Kachi Vs the State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary and Others

Shivaji S/O Banduji Chaudhari vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Pso Ps Chandur Railway Dist Amravati

Sunil Bhaurao Gomase and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra Thr Pso, Ps Tiosa

Shivaji Dattatraya Karale Vs Vaishali Shivaji Karale