Disposed¶23

Dorugade Suresh Laxman and Ors. v. Kurude Ekta Nitin and Ors.

Bombay HC28 Jan 2025WP/16263/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court writ petition disposed; direction to revisional authority to decide pending stay application within four weeks; Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act 1960 section 154; Revision Application No. RAV/2024/CR230/15.C; stay application pending over 10 months; impugned judgement and order dated 1st March 2024 by Registrar, Co-operative Societies; no opinion expressed on merits; Additional Government Pleader to communicate order forthwith.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of with directions to the revisional authority to decide the petitioners' application for stay within four weeks, and to the Additional Government Pleader to communicate the order to the revisional authority forthwith. ¶23

Dorugade Suresh Laxman and Ors. vs Kurude Ekta Nitin and Ors. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

10-WP.16263.2024

¶2

Jvs.

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 16263 OF 2024

¶5

Dorugade Suresh Laxman & Ors. } Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

Kurade Ekta Nitin & Ors. } Respondents

¶8

Mr. Hemant Ghadigaonkar with Mr. Majid I. for petitioner.

¶9

Mr. N. C. Walimbe, Additional Government Pleader with Mr. R. S. Pawar, AGP for respondents 3 to 5.

¶10

CORAM: ALOK ARADHE, CJ. & BHARATI DANGRE, J.

¶11

DATE: JANUARY 28, 2025

¶12

P.C.:

¶13

1. With consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is heard finally.

¶14

2. In this writ petition, the petitioners, inter alia , seek a direction to the revisional authority to decide Revision Application No. RAV/2024/CR230/15.C pending before the revisional authority within a stipulated time and to stay the impugned judgement and order dated 1^st March 2024 passed by the Registrar, Co-operative Societies.

¶15

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that being aggrieved by the order dated 1^st March 2024 passed by the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, the petitioners have filed a

¶16

¶17

10-WP.16263.2024

¶18

Revision Application under section 154 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 along with an application for stay on 6^th March 2024, however, till today, the application for stay has not been decided.

¶19

4. Learned counsel for respondent nos. 3 to 5 submits that the revision application shall be decided within such time limit as may be directed by this Court.

¶20

5. In the aforesaid circumstances, taking into account the fact that the application for stay is pending before the revisional authority for more than 10 months, we deem it appropriate to direct the revisional authority to decide the application for stay filed by the petitioners within a period of four weeks from today.

¶21

6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

¶22

7. Learned Additional Government Pleader shall communicate this order to the revisional authority forthwith.

¶23

8. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶24

Digitally signed by JAYANT JAYANTVISHWANATH VISHWANATHSALUNKE SALUNKE Date: 2025.01.28 19:50:32 +0530

¶25

(BHARATI DANGRE, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶26

Dorugade Suresh Laxman and Ors. v. Kurude Ekta Nitin and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dorugade Suresh Laxman and Ors. v. Kurude Ekta Nitin and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Manoaj Nautamlal Shah vs Dev Land and Housing Ltd.

Mahendra Ramniklal Shah vs M/S Gangar Infrastructure

Anant Vasudeo Sawant vs the State of Maharashtra, through the Divisional Joint Registrar

Heart and Soul Entertainment Ltd. vs Deepak Shivkumar Bahry

Trimurti Jankalyan Sanstha through Its Treasurer vs Bombay Municipal Corporation through Its Commissioner

Dev Engineers through Its Partner Raghuvir Purohit vs State of Maharashtra through Secretary Department of Forest Cultural Affairs and Fisheries