Disposed¶9

Deepak Chhagan Rathod v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Principal Secretary and Anr.

Bombay HC3 Dec 2025WP/16020/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court common order dated 03-12-2025 by Ghuge & Bhobe JJ.; matters deferred for paucity of time; office objections to be removed in two weeks; ad-interim/interim protection continues subject to compliance; replies/rejoinders one week before next date; spare copies within 14 days else dismissal against unserved respondents on 15th day; notice returnable after four weeks; listing chart 06.01.2026-14.01.2026 (Fresh/Urgent/Due Admission); procedural order, no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

Procedural common order: continuation of existing ad-interim/interim orders subject to removal of office objections within two weeks, with the listed matters deferred and re-listed on specified dates in January 2026. ¶9

Deepak Chhagan Rathod vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Principal Secretary and Anr. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE

¶2

Common Order-3.12.2025.odt

¶3

Digitally signed by TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2025.12.04 14:32:40 +0530

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION/ CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ. DATE : 3^rd December, 2025.

¶6

P.C. :-

¶7

At the time of rising at 5.35 p.m., the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No. 7 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.

¶8

In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.

¶9

Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.

¶10

The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed at least one week before the next date.

¶11

Matters in which service of notice is awaited, put up after service.

¶12

Matters in which though notices were issued, the office could not process the notice due to non-supply of spare copies, the Petitioner shall supply spare copies for issuance of notice within 14 days, failing which, the matters in which copies are not supplied, would stand dismissed as against the unserved Respondents on the 15^th day. If copies are supplied, office to issue notice to the unserved

¶13

1 of 2

¶14

Trupti

¶15

Common Order-3.12.2025.odt

¶16

Respondents, returnable after four weeks.

¶17

7. Subject to the above, list these matters as under:-

¶18

Serial Nos. of matters on the Board	To be listed on	To be listed in the category
7 to 12	06.01.2026	Fresh Admission
14 to 38	06.01.2026	Fresh Admission
40 to 80	07.01.2026	Fresh Admission
81 to 101	08.01.2026	Fresh Admission
103 to 128	09.01.2026	Fresh Admission
129 and 130	12.01.2026	Urgent Admission
131 to 152	12.01.2026	Due Admission
155 to 198	13.01.2026	Due Admission
200 to 216	14.01.2026	Due Admission
218 and 219	14.01.2026	Due Admission

¶19

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

¶20

2 of 2

¶21

Trupti

Deepak Chhagan Rathod v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Principal Secretary and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Chhagan Rathod v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Principal Secretary and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mahesh Shripad Chandurkar vs Punjab National Bank

Jyoti Devrao Bharati vs State of Government of Maharashtra

Mayuresh Madhukar Pawar and Anr. vs Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Masira Bi Hanif Patel vs Union of India

Pune Mahanagarpalika Kamgar Sanghatana Throu. Gen. Sec. Sakharam Kisan Palse vs the State of Maharashtra Throu. Its Principal Sec. Urban Development Dept and Anr.

Akhil Bhartiya Mathadi, Thansport and General Kamkar Union (Regd) Thr. Its Joint Secretary and Anr. vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary Labour Department and Ors.