Vasant Mahadevrao Tat and Others v. State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court Aurangabad Bench batch order, 23-12-2025, Arun R. Pedneker J.: 26 writ petitions (Slip Nos. 929-956; W.P. Nos. 15583-15618 of 2025) - notice to respondents returnable 06/01/2026; humdast allowed; service by all private permissible modes permitted; AGP waived service for respondent-State; S. K. Kadam and V. H. Dighe waived service for respondent Nos. 2 and 3; petitioner advocate Sikchi Aditya N.; interim notice order, no merits decided, no ratio.
What did the court decide?
Interim order only: notice ordered to the respondents, returnable on 06/01/2026; humdast allowed; petitioners permitted to serve the respondents by all private permissible modes; the learned AGP waived service of notice for the respondent-State and Messrs. S. K. Kadam and V. H. Dighe waived service for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in the respective petitions. No merits adjudicated.