Dismissed¶2
Pushpa Vitthal Magar v. Late Pandurang Kondiba Saste Throu. His L.H.
Bombay HCWP/14967/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Short dismissal order: writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to absence of petitioner and counsel ('None for the petitioner'). Parties: Pushpa Vitthal Magar (petitioner) v. Late Pandurang Kondiba Saste through legal heirs (respondent). Bench: Amit Borkar, J. (single judge). Forum: High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction; WRIT PETITION NO.14967 OF 2024; dated JANUARY 27, 2025. No statutes cited, no cases cited, no issues framed, no quantum involved. Useful only as an instance of procedural dismissal for non-prosecution; carries no citable substantive holding.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution, none being present on behalf of the petitioner. ¶2