Dismissed¶16
Madhav S/O. Dinkarrao Sargar v. Dnyaneshwar S/O. Achyutrao Aarmal and Others
Bombay HCWP/1429/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Condonation of delay - nine-year delay (2016) in assailing order dated 31.10.2007 dismissing private complaint for want of prosecution - SCC No. 1324/2006 / Summary Criminal Case No. 1324/2006 - impugned order dated 20.03.2018 of Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani - Criminal Writ Petition No. 1429 of 2018 - Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench - Sushil M. Ghodeswar, J. - decided 10.12.2025 - writ petition dismissed, no interference - legal aid counsel fees to be quantified and paid as per rules.
What did the court decide?
The impugned order rejecting the condonation of delay application was based on adequate justification and required no interference by this Court; accordingly the writ petition was dismissed. ¶16