Rizwana Begum Mohd. Shafioddin Shaikh and Another v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petitions under Article 226 jurisdiction (Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench) disposed of without merits adjudication on ground of supervening events; communication dated 15.10.2024 from Education Officer (Primary) to headmaster taken on record and marked exhibit 'X'; petitioners Rizwana Begum Mohd. Shafioddin Shaikh and Munshi Shagifta Begum Samiuddin represented by Syed Masood Chand; State represented by AGPs P.J. Bharad and S.S. Joshi; Respondent No.4 represented by U.B. Bondar and Satish S. Manale; decided 18.02.2025; neutral citation 2025:BHC-AUG:4908-DB; no statutes or precedents cited; no quantum awarded.
What did the court decide?
The Court, per curiam, took on record a copy of the communication dated 15.10.2024 received by the headmaster from the Education Officer (Primary) concerned, marked it 'X' for the purpose of identification, and disposed of both writ petitions on the submission that, in the light of supervening events, nothing survives.