Lahanabai Mahadu Thelari v. the Union of India through the Deputy Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Aurangabad bench division order dated 18.12.2025 allowing 57 NHAI compensation writ petitions (slip nos. 904-960) for solatium and interest per Union of India v. Tarsem Singh (2019) 9 SCC 304; six-month payment timeline; subject to Sections 34/37 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 challenges; Section 3G(5) National Highways Act 1956 remedy for aggrieved parties; reasonable hearing to stakeholders; mere filing of NHAI review petition (Diary No(s)44096 of 2025) did not bar disposal; judges Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi and Hiten S. Venegavkar; advocates Mr. A. D. Sonar (petitioners), Mr. Deepak S. Manorkar (NHAI).
What did the court decide?
Competent authorities directed to compute and pay solatium and interest on compensation in accordance with the principles in Union of India v. Tarsem Singh, (2019) 9 SCC 304, within six months, upon verification of documents produced by petitioners; payments subject to challenges under Sections 34 and 37, Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996; aggrieved parties may invoke Section 3G(5), National Highways Act 1956; reasonable hearing to stakeholders; decision subject to the outcome of the review petition before the Supreme Court.