Freny Rajan Roy v. Rajan Roy
Case brief
What is this about?
testamentary petition; probate; letters of administration; notice to non-consenting legal heirs; general notice; affidavit of service; surety justification; Administration Bond; Rules 399 and 400, Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980; Rule 407; cross petition; praecipe; final grant; removed from board; none present for petitioner; Company Registrar / Testamentary Registrar; Kavita Y. Ambekar; E-filing; 40 TP/6120/2025; 01.12.2025.
What did the court decide?
No substantive relief granted. Procedural directions were issued: office to issue notice (including to non-consenting legal heirs); advocate to file affidavit of service of general notice, serve non-consenting heirs per Rules 399 and 400, justify their surety and furnish Administration Bond; office to verify any cross petition (Rule 407); matter removed from board subject to praecipe for final grant.